you not being sure about the validity of her argument is irrelevant.
Sure it is.
She is not upholding the law or her oath. That is fact.
It is not a fact
She IS only doing her job when she feels like it.
No she is not..
You not being sure, remaining uninformed, trying to muddy the waters have nothing to do with the facts.
Argumentative. More assertions
The fact is she swore to uphold the law.
She did not swear to kill her mother and father if it became law or curse God or violate her beliefs if they ever became law or endorse gay marriage licences.
Yet another fact is that judges cannot do whatever they want.
I explained to you what I meant by that.
A final fact is that she in no way has to endorse a marriage to sign it,
That is not a fact. It is your opinion. She has hers.
As far as knowing whether or not her claim is invalid, she has lost every challenge and no more are left. She lost, her claim is invalid. Every single person who actually understands the issues grasped that. That you didn't, freely admit that you are uninformed on the matter and have made no attempt to bother to learn the facts makes your laughing little more than personification of the phrase "ignorance is bliss". And trust me, you were never arguing to win. Heck, you don't even have an argument. You've nothing but being uninformed and happy about that.
So you are not a lawyer. I am not laughing. I only said that I would.
In essence, you're why we can't have nice things.
You hurt me. Sad If I am giving you the wrong impression about me with my posts. That is unfair to say that about me based on my posts and not having all of the facts about the person that I am.