Fisherman, its an illustration. Its like a Muslim working for a barbecue place and refusing to serve me pork
I agreed It was a great illustration. That sums up what this issue is all about. That is the issue and not anyone's views on ss. What I meant to say is what in the world does refusing to issue ss licenses or serving pork or spaghetti have anything to do with how ss is viewed. She can have anti-gay views but it is her job to serve the spagheti, the pork, and issue the ss license. In other words this issue is all about not wanting to serve pork or spaghetti. That is it. That is what I meant. It is not about gay views. When I said the spaghetti was paid for, I meant that the gays were entitled to the licenses.
Saying that I have no dog in this fight means that how this case turns out does not make any difference to me. I am not gay and I and neither do I wish to stop gays from marrying and neither am I a a supporter or believer of the right wing fundamentalist. I am not an advocate of either side. Both sides have the right to their belief in the USA.
I do not have any friends that are fundamentalists, whoever they are. I do not care. I have friends that are gay both men and women, celibate JW and non JW. They feel at ease with me and I feel at ease with them.