Be convinced. UC
UC, I have posted previously that JW have evidence that trumps whether or not the gt comes within the expected generation ,however, TD very keenly established that this discussion is not about personal belief but about whether JW theology on the gc is academically and mathematically valid given wt interpretation of the "Olivette" and how wt applies it to 1914. IT is from that position that I am responding to your post and others.
Case in point: Jehovah's angel communicates with you . That trumps everything but it does not explain whether the wt interpretation of 1914, generation, etc is academically and mathematically correct. JW are convinced "wt" is God's org, HS is behind the preaching work, the meetings, the publications, the assemblies, , the discipline...
So for a JW that has the trumping evidence, even though they cannot understand why wt teachings about the generation, etc do not seem to add up, it is moot because the remarkable evidence that they have trumps. But this discussion ain't about that, IT is about the correctness of wt theology on generation in connection with 1914 and whether the integrated wt gc teaching t limits generation to a point that it invalidates wt theology on 1914.
What I am trying to show is whether or not wt theology falls apart if the gt does not come within the lifespan of people born circa 1935.