Pointing out that Jehovah's Witnesses are no different than anybody else in this respect is a reiteration of the obvious. TD
That is not what I did. Kindly, read below.
Therefore, you conclude that in a survival situation jw should be required to consume blood same as a Jew is required to eat to save his life over keeping kosher? WT does not view it like that.
compare
14 "What if a doctor tells us that we will die if we do not have a blood transfusion? Each person must decide whether to obey God’s law on blood. Christians deeply respect God’s gift of life, and we will look for alternative treatments to keep living; but we will not accept a blood transfusion."
I was pointing out the difference that Judaism requires that a Jew eat non kosher to save his life and the wt teaches that each person must decide whether to obey God's law on blood.
Your quote from the JW website is a good illustration of the mechanical application of law of which I spoke.
Can you explain what do you mean by "mechanical" application of the Law.
Do you believe that Jesus of the Bible broke the Sabbath? Why or why not?
Thank you for your clarification so as not to confuse with "Heysus" the Spanish kid who broke into the house in your story on the Sabbath.
All kidding aside, I see your point: Assuming that receiving a blood transfusion violates God's Law, God must allow laws to be broken same as Jesus used God's Holy Spirit to work on the Sabbath (.."..My father has kept working until now and I keep working.. because Lord of the Sabbath is what the son of man is..." Hence God should allow JW eating blood and receiving "life saving" blood transfusion to survive because JW conscience is (seemingly) ONLY based upon wt interpretation of Scripture.