i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
I hope the things you protect with glee are never visited upon your family. dubstepped
What are you saying dubstepped? What am I protecting with glee?
You have never met me and you do not know who I am. How then are you saying that I am protecting anybody? That is a blatant lie!
You have said a lot of things on this thread. All I that have done in our discussion is to ask you questions about the things that you have said.
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
Yet those bastards know the kids are likely being raped and do nothing. dubstepped
What kids are likely being raped? And who knows about it?
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
dubstepped you are wrong about that. I have my personal views too and so do wt elders. It is legislation that does the protection, not me and not wt. Just pointing out the law. You don't have to like it and neither do I.
I suggest you readcRichard Olivers posts on non-disclosure protection of church communications.
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
Fin, Richard Oliver is saying that people are not liable or held legally accountable for doing things that are not moral, but only if a persons actions or conduct violates the law or causes harm or damages to someone or sonething. You can express outrage about it, but it you try to stop a person from doing something you geel is immoral and that person has a right to do it, you can get in trouble.
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
So what your saying then the Catholic religion and the JWS religion shouldn't have never been held accountable or responsible for their actions
Fin, read Richard Oliver's Kiwanis illustration, please.
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
JW tries to reform "these" people which is a lot more than a lot of people do. It is something because it teaches the person to stop himself.
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
The laws of land are there and devised to protect the population from harm.
That is what trials are all about when someone is accused of harming somebody else.
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
WT brought up the argument at the Conti trial, DA and ACS knew about Kendricks, why didn't the gov warn and protect having the duty to protect physically. Instead of unleashing him upon society. WT made it clear at the trial that they provide spiritual protection, they have no legal responsibilty to protect physically.
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
Things have to change but that involve new legislation
And you can't take that to Court and sue for damages. The law is what it is and if you try to enforce your morality against the law, you are in trouble.
i was pondering the recent influx of lawsuits against wt, specifically in regards to the child abuse cases (ie.
conti, fessler, lopez, etc).. in each of these, wt has settled for an "undisclosed" amount, assumed to be in the millions of dollars each.
i know there are many many more cases, subject for a different thread i'm sure.. i was reading something completely unrelated a while back that mentioned the dangers of settlement agreements for a large corporation or business (not just wt).
Costo has many members. If one of its members or employees punched you, also a member, while you were at a bar, can you sue Costco?
Suppose you, a member of Coscto, got punched by another member of Coscto inside Costco, can you sue Costco?
Suppose a Coscto employee working at the time inside Costco, punched you, can you sue Costco? Suppose he was outside the store having a lunch break when he punched you?
Suppose a Costco employee inside the store banged a pallet jack into you and hurt you, Can you sue the store? Can you sue Costco if the store is owned by another corporation?
Of course you can sue whenever you like, but is Costco liable?
