http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
My takeaway from these ARC hearings is that the Jehovah's Witnesses organization is a cruel religion!
Shouldnt you allow the investigation to continue and be completed and wait until the Australian government forms an opinion on the commission's findings and recommendations, then look at all of the facts, before forming a personal opinion?
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
Fisherman, you invalidate yourself OC
Saying so does not make it so, same as unsubstantiated assertions are nothing more than assertions.
Also, what do you mean by saying that what I say invalidates me. What you say doesn't make sense.
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
Angus laughing at them
To Orphan Crow and Dubstepped:
I doubt very much that a commissioner of the Australian government acting in his official capacity would do this, as it would indicate an existing mindset and not fact finding objectivity in the investigation. The role of an investigator is to find facts and not laugh at people under investigation. If it were true it could be a reflection of the government that put him in that position if such government lnew about it allowed him to continue in his appointed position.
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
Please just ghost...... dubstepped
How would that verify anything that you say or invalidate anything that I say?
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
Covering up the abuse of children....,
What do you mean by "covering up the abuse of children"?
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
Of course legal details and minutiae are important.
Of course? What do you think legal proccedings against wt in the US are about?
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
@jwleaks. The point Richard Oliver is making is 3rd party liability as it relates to Watchtower. For example, if an agency relationship existed between someone and Wachtower, Wt is vicariously liable for the actions of the agent towards a 3rd party. Fiduciary duty and vicarous liability is explained below.
http://www.giottoslibrary.com/giotto/ebooks/fiddut3.nsf/fCNTPgRMRead3?OpenForm&Cat1=LA4&Cat2=LB6
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
@jw leaks post facts not colors.
I did not say members of the Corporation.
As for case law read Richard Oliver post on WT and fiduciary relationship with any of its members. (members of the religion) He also posted an illustration on how it applies and so did I using members of Costo. I did not say that Costo members were corporate members. Read it and then I am sure you will understand what I mean. (vicarious liability and wt: acts of agent same as act of principal.
Have a cup of tea mate.
As for context on this thread re-read my post again as it relates to the post that I was responding to.
The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania is a non-stock, not-for-profit organization[1] headquartered in Warwick, New York. It is the main legal entity used worldwide by Jehovah's Witnesses to direct, administer and develop doctrines for the religion and is often referred to by members of the religion simply as "the Society". It is the parent organization of a number of Watch Tower subsidiaries, including the Watchtower Society of New York and International Bible Students Association.[2][3] The number of voting shareholders of the corporation is limited to between 300 and 500 "mature, active and faithful" male Jehovah's Witnesses.[4] About 5800 Jehovah's Witnesses provide voluntary unpaid labour, as members of a religious order, in three large Watch Tower Society faciliti
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
not one representative from Brooklyn
In all fairness, Spinks offered to have wt lawyers represent wt legal position, go back and listen to that part of the video.
ARC is not a trial.And Spinks & O'Brien are getting eaten alive!
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
.
doesn't mean that they are an agent of that religion
That is true, US case law shows that the Courts have ruled that there is no fiduciary relationship between the watchtower and its members.
