Absolutely not.
under these circumstances the Law is giving PERMISSION to eat unbled meat.
If an Israelite farmer found an animal "already dead" he was free to eat it with IMPUNITY..
VS
(Deuteronomy 14:21) 21 “You must not eat
any animal that was found dead. You may give it to the foreign resident
who is inside your cities, and he may eat it, or it may be sold to a
foreigner. For you are a holy people to Jehovah your God. . .
(Numbers 15:40) 40 This will help you remember, and you will observe
all my commandments and be holy to your God.
(Numbers 15:30, 31) . . .“‘But the person who
does something deliberately,
whether he is native-born or a foreign resident, is blaspheming Jehovah
and must be cut off from among his people. 31 Because he has despised
Jehovah’s word and broken his commandment, that person should be cut off
without fail. His own error is upon him.’”
(Leviticus 17:14-16) 14 For the life of every sort of flesh is its blood, because the life is in it. Consequently, I said to the Israelites: “You must not eat the blood of any sort of flesh because the life of every sort of flesh is its blood. Anyone eating it will be cut off.” 15 If anyone, whether a native or a foreigner, eats an animal found dead or one torn by a wild animal, he must then wash his garments and bathe in water and be unclean until the evening; then he will be clean. 16 But if he does not wash them and does not bathe himself, he will answer for his error.’”
Lev 17:14-16 distinguishes between the blood of dead animals and the blood of an animal sacrificed for food. Albeit eating dead animals was forbidden to the Israelites under the law of Moses confuting your bleiefs that it was not.
(By the way, unless your color adds to the validity of your argument, you are wasting my time and everybody else that does not wish to be distracted from the subject matter -unless that is your intention.)
