dub, I told you. If you want to make a statement or ask a question about the topic, I may decide to respond to you -if I wish. But I am not required to. If you dont like that, too bad for you. Do you have a view you wish to express about the Topic?
Fisherman
JoinedPosts by Fisherman
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
You demand answers of everyone else but never put your own views out there. Are you hiding something?
dub, I can ask. No one is required to answer. This is not a court room.
Lets say you are walking down the street and stopped by a cop and he tells you, lets go down to the precinct, we want to ask you some questions. What should you do?
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
1. You are defending a stance on blood that is directly reflective of the WT view.
I have not been convinced otherwise. My most enjoyable dialogues have been with TD and with Marvin Shilmer and with others too.
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
dub, why do ypu agree with all the views here?
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
So again I ask you, is the JW commentary the one that you choose to rest upon?
That has no relevance to the topic. But if you want to know. I can PM you
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
dub, you can post your views on the subject. I am not going to make fun of what you say.
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
How can you say this? Are you an authority
Can you show that cofty is more than an advocate?
So then, is that the commentary that you choose to rest upon?
You single out wt because you are sore but in my post I referenced other commentators. But wt is an "authority" to jw. Whether or not you or I view them as such does not change that fact. -
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
Eating an unbled animal found dead was not a sin so this verse has no relevance.
Yes it does. Deu14:21
discussed this verse at length. You ignored my answer and now you pretend I haven't answered it. This is why I call you a coward and a liar.
I did not and posting your trash is no licence to offend me and other posters that disagree with you.
This verse is about an animal torn by wild beasts. It was bled. It has no relevance to our conversation.
It does. It commands Israel to be Holy. Eating dead animals and torn ones are put in the same category and both forbidden to eat.
I have never attempted to show that blood is not sacred to god. I have consistently said the exact opposite.
"...insofar...." You play both sides
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
First of all, relax have a cup of tea. You keep going on a rant with me. You are only an advocate here, not an authority, and not an arbitrator. Your commentary is trash because it is only your opinion; in this sense it is trash because it does not establish anything at all except how you see things. On the other hand, wt is an authority to jw and their commentary matters, so does Rashi, Sforno, Rambam, Nachimedes. Ebn Ezra- and other to Jews. You commentary is trash - but it is your opinion and you are entitled to it; you are no authority here.
Why is there a difference if the blood is sacred in the way JWs believe it to be?
Why is there a difference between the blood poured out from a slaughtered animal and the blood eaten with the flesh from such animal (Scripture and verse please)
I want to point out to you that your premise is that: "Blood .. sacred... insofar.." The burden of proof is yours not mine. You can believe your conclusions but I dont buy them. I have pointed out to you that all that you have shown in your argument is that blood from a creature that has not been slaughtered for food is different than that of animal slaughtered for food, and therefore SHOULD BE trash because you say so in your premise.
According to this verse an Israelite farmer could have brought gallons of blood drained from live animals to the altar to atone for his sins.
Jewish law forbade assaulting an animal for food without slaughtering it. On this basis alone it was forbidden. It would be like tearing off a limb from a live animal and offering it to God or eating it.
So lets get to the point of all this. You argue that blood from live animals and humans should be trash because no life was taken -says you.
Or does God forbid pumping gallons of blood into your body because blood is sacred to God and because God forbids blood to be eaten?
How do you you know? Ask cofty?!!
-
556
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty in... but, they fail to take note of one important detail.. i believe that if we are going to have any chance of reasoning with a jw about blood, this is the place we need to begin.. don't try to convince them that it was only a dietary law.
it wasn't, and they will never go along with it.. don't tell them that saving a life is more important than obeying a law, even a seemingly trivial one.
they take pride in obedience.
-
-
Fisherman
dont have time to read trash. scriptire and verse