story breaking on reuters here.... kim jong-un seems determined to start a war.
nk is a national cult of personality.
hating the rest of the world is the first tenet of faith..
On the other, he needs to make sure that Kim has a way out that saves face.
DT could have done that to begin with, then, instead of his rhetoric, now the US has to retreat to the position before DT's threat and negotiate something to make NK stop from shooting missiles over other people's houses. NK called DT bluff and now the US has to eat it's words -unless of course DT intended to make good on his threats, he blundered.
No comment from the White House yet on the missile.
story breaking on reuters here.... kim jong-un seems determined to start a war.
nk is a national cult of personality.
hating the rest of the world is the first tenet of faith..
The US 51st's fighter jets continue to roam the skies 10 miles north of NK's border every day threatening NK and ready for war.
story breaking on reuters here.... kim jong-un seems determined to start a war.
nk is a national cult of personality.
hating the rest of the world is the first tenet of faith..
is exactly the problem: the failure to search for and find other options.
What options? NK moved KN to K5 --getting the stonewall. Unless the US makes a move, DT only is playing cards.
story breaking on reuters here.... kim jong-un seems determined to start a war.
nk is a national cult of personality.
hating the rest of the world is the first tenet of faith..
And unfortunately Trump is exactly the wrong person to de-escalate.
After threatening with 'fire and fury', is DT going to make a stronger threat? -Or regret what he said. The US is not ready for war with NK. He should not have made the threat unless he was prepared to carry it out. If DT downplays NKs defiance, who will take the US seriously the next time it utters a warning?
chapter 24. feed the rounder.
i was dying everyday on the machines.
i prayed.
chapter 24. feed the rounder.
i was dying everyday on the machines.
i prayed.
Pressman were a different breed from all the others in the factory.
Did you room in 58?
i know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
You are too dumb to even understand the question.
Since the Bible does not say, your attack on me is not relevant to your theory -but another one of your disguised deflections which does nothing to help your plea to believe your interpretations.
i know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
you provide a succinct answer.
versus: How does the Bible answer. I cannot go beyond the things written.
I have reconciled every scripture regarding blood.
You
i know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
The question
@ Cofty:The Bible does not say -unless you can show that it does. Further, your question is another deflection evading the scriptures that debunk your article.
i know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
spent 30 pages trying to explain it to you. I see you have learned nothing in the past 5 months.
@ Cofty: And to talk again about the topic, as Nathan Natas pointed out to you, your arrogant assertions fall down on their own merit. The Bible needs to talk. Who needs to listen to your pages and pages of explanations of Scripture, as if your explanations and conclusions based upon Cofty's beliefs established anything at all. You were shown scriptures falsifying your assertions. You failed to buttress your assertions with the Bible but instead deflected using Cofty based explanations, going on and on and on, repeating your Cofty based claims -which is a waste of time for anyone who sincerely wants to make a Bible based decision. Your theories sit upon your conclusion that God somehow gave Israel derivative approval to eat blood from dead animals. The scriptures I showed you invalidate your claims.
