because he was shunned by his customers?.
Why is he recounting the reasons for Mr. Wall's expulsion from the Congregation™?
I think it is because disclosure rests with the congregant. The congregant in this case, the respondent, already disclosed the confidential information you reference to the Courts.
because he was shunned by his customers?.
let's be real.
Very real. And worse. And: judges and prosecutors are untouchables. Read the news, Google it, go around the block for once in your life.
because he was shunned by his customers?.
to deny a human the right to speak to another human is against universal law.
IF you can prove to me that saying a friendly greeting to someone will cause them to receive a restrainting order please let me know what state or country I can file that restraing order In
In the US, a plaintiff can go to a judge and make allegations against another person and persuade the judge to grant a temporary order of protection without the other person being present. Let's say both parties live in the same building, the judge can order the defendant not even to say Hi or even look at Plaintiff --and if he does, off to jail. The case can drag on for years and then later on the case can be dismissed, plea-bargained, or tried.
because he was shunned by his customers?.
was Ray Franz not disfellowshipped for having dinner with his disfellowshipped employer?
Unrepentance -not guilt- is the ground for df. As it relates to association with a df person, business relationships are a personal decisions but social association with a df goes against JW doctrine and can be grounds for a JC being formed.
because he was shunned by his customers?.
The judicial review is because elders do not follow rules carefully as outlined by service dept .
Mr. Ngam argues that there is no legal relationship between church and member in this case, only non justiciable religious obligation between church and member exists.
because he was shunned by his customers?.
He also said... I will later post
Or you could just listen to that question that justice Maldavier posed to Mr. Gnam that goes with what Mr Gnam "also said". ( On the already posted vid of the appeals hearing.)
because he was shunned by his customers?.
so if the elders sneakily told publishers not to do business with mrwall
That's a horse of a different color. But can such a case be heard, and can it be adjudicated as a judicial review?
then they crossed the line they did not follow there own rules this would be part of the judicial review as a citizen not religious.
Maybe not. The case law is in dispute and Court has not decided. Mr Gnam argued that respondent could bring the issue up as a tort, etc.
because he was shunned by his customers?.
spoonfed nomore, has uploaded a video on his youtube site, of exjw activists protesting inside a kingdom hall during this sunday meeting.
several people speak out.
if some one can put a link on here that would be awesome, i can’t figure out how to do it with an i phone.
because he was shunned by his customers?.
Mr Wall given notice that his business would be affected. R456
In this case, respondent confessed to sinful conduct establishing guilt but df is not based upon guilt but upon what elders discern is godly repentance as elders determine guided by HS and asking for direction in prayer. Interesting to see how the court can review such JC decision in Canada.
I can understand if the brother disagrees with the elders and believes that he is repentant and should not be df but as a repentant JW he also believes in God's organization, etc.,etc., so how could he possibly turn to Caesar for justice.
