Fisherman

Joined

• started 155 topics
• posted 5,295 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Fisherman

• 
  73

  2 witness rule

  by punkofnice in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i'm gobsmacked.. the 7 rock star popes in warwick know darned well that the 2 witness rule allows child rapists to get away with their crime.. geoff (whacko jacko) jackson was at the australian royal commission and should have seen first hand what a vile man made law the 2 witness rule is.. my question is, why do they still insist on this pervert protecting rule?.

  i know it's a highly controlling cult but still...........................stuff my old boots, mate!.

  the above is more a rhetorical question.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  They are simply told to make sure the victim and family are informed they can go to the authorities but given no support to do this. They should be doing everything possible to support the victim and help them get the right help as well as ensure the authorities are able to investigate an allegation so that the risk of leaving a predatory sexual abuser free to do whatever they want is minimised as far as humanly possible.

  That is arguable. Any accusation of wrong against the church is considered on a case by case basis.
  
  
• 
  73

  2 witness rule

  by punkofnice in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i'm gobsmacked.. the 7 rock star popes in warwick know darned well that the 2 witness rule allows child rapists to get away with their crime.. geoff (whacko jacko) jackson was at the australian royal commission and should have seen first hand what a vile man made law the 2 witness rule is.. my question is, why do they still insist on this pervert protecting rule?.

  i know it's a highly controlling cult but still...........................stuff my old boots, mate!.

  the above is more a rhetorical question.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  the 2 witness rule allows child rapists to get away with their crime.
  

  Relating to church doctrine and practice, the "2 witness rule" applies but concurrently with that, the church also complies with all statutory requirements for reporting any allegation of child sexual abuse and child abuse to competent authorities as mandated in the local jurisdiction the church operates.
  
  
• 
  106

  Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada

  by poopie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  because he was shunned by his customers?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  @Search RE: Factual Submissions by both parties.

  "That is your side of the Story" -Fisherman

  "Which, as my lawyer said to the Supreme Court, is precisely why we have judges." -Search

  The "100% facts" that the elders submitted is for the legal proceedings that decide whether or not you get to have your day in Court. Your related posts apparently confuses that with the Judicial Review - if you win..
  
• 
  106

  Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada

  by poopie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  because he was shunned by his customers?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  as my lawyer said to the Supreme Court, is precisely why we have judges.

  IF the Court takes you case.
  
  
• 
  14

  What does the society fill about psychiatrist?.

  by new boy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  please help .

  more research for my book .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  What everyone needs to consider before going to a shrink is that you then have a psychiatrist record. Like a conviction or some other record that sheds a bad light on you, a psychiatric record is not good.
• 
  106

  Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada

  by poopie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  because he was shunned by his customers?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  the affidavits of the two elders are being presented as being 100% factual,

  Your complaint or whatever cause of action you filed is also presented as 100 percent factual. No?

  to which I not only strongly disagree,

  That's your side of the story.
• 
  106

  Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada

  by poopie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  because he was shunned by his customers?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  In my case, the opposite has been done.

  If you claim that Appellants violated confidentiality: Lawsuit! Big bucks!!!!!

  Did you or your lawyers object to the protected information being used in Court?
• 
  106

  Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada

  by poopie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  because he was shunned by his customers?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Not dumb stuff ie stalking beating up spouse.

  OK, but let's anyway consider such a case: A Family Court or Criminal Court can proscribe communication between family members.
  
  
• 
  106

  Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada

  by poopie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  because he was shunned by his customers?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  I dislike that man with a passion.

  All personal feelings aside, Gnam is a very talented lawyer. He did a thorough job in arguing wt position on the related case.
  
  
• 
  106

  Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada

  by poopie in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  because he was shunned by his customers?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Why is he recounting the reasons for Mr. Wall's expulsion from the Congregation™?

  I think it is because disclosure rests with the congregant. The congregant in this case, the respondent, already disclosed the confidential information you reference to the Courts.