In one of the cases wt defended involving church confidentiality, wt told the Court something to the effect of: "I wish you would make things easy for us." That is because, as wt claims, it is challenging for the church to both be required to report and at the same time be required to keep protected information confidential. All that needs to be done in the US is to unify all reporting laws in every state, amend the Constitution and to nationally abolish all privacy rights between the church and congregant in cases involving child abuse. The church could then be concerned with providing spiritual assistance to those child abusers behind bars. The gov could also proscribe child abusers from joining any churches. ... In the meantime, legislation is what it is.
Fisherman
JoinedPosts by Fisherman
-
73
2 witness rule
by punkofnice ini'm gobsmacked.. the 7 rock star popes in warwick know darned well that the 2 witness rule allows child rapists to get away with their crime.. geoff (whacko jacko) jackson was at the australian royal commission and should have seen first hand what a vile man made law the 2 witness rule is.. my question is, why do they still insist on this pervert protecting rule?.
i know it's a highly controlling cult but still...........................stuff my old boots, mate!.
the above is more a rhetorical question.
-
-
-
73
2 witness rule
by punkofnice ini'm gobsmacked.. the 7 rock star popes in warwick know darned well that the 2 witness rule allows child rapists to get away with their crime.. geoff (whacko jacko) jackson was at the australian royal commission and should have seen first hand what a vile man made law the 2 witness rule is.. my question is, why do they still insist on this pervert protecting rule?.
i know it's a highly controlling cult but still...........................stuff my old boots, mate!.
the above is more a rhetorical question.
-
-
Fisherman
"Fair point, on the other hand, again, as I said before...." --Konceptual
Again, same point.
-
73
2 witness rule
by punkofnice ini'm gobsmacked.. the 7 rock star popes in warwick know darned well that the 2 witness rule allows child rapists to get away with their crime.. geoff (whacko jacko) jackson was at the australian royal commission and should have seen first hand what a vile man made law the 2 witness rule is.. my question is, why do they still insist on this pervert protecting rule?.
i know it's a highly controlling cult but still...........................stuff my old boots, mate!.
the above is more a rhetorical question.
-
-
Fisherman
They are simply told to make sure the victim and family are informed they can go to the authorities but given no support to do this. They should be doing everything possible to support the victim and help them get the right help as well as ensure the authorities are able to investigate an allegation so that the risk of leaving a predatory sexual abuser free to do whatever they want is minimised as far as humanly possible.
That is arguable. Any accusation of wrong against the church is considered on a case by case basis.
-
73
2 witness rule
by punkofnice ini'm gobsmacked.. the 7 rock star popes in warwick know darned well that the 2 witness rule allows child rapists to get away with their crime.. geoff (whacko jacko) jackson was at the australian royal commission and should have seen first hand what a vile man made law the 2 witness rule is.. my question is, why do they still insist on this pervert protecting rule?.
i know it's a highly controlling cult but still...........................stuff my old boots, mate!.
the above is more a rhetorical question.
-
-
Fisherman
the 2 witness rule allows child rapists to get away with their crime.
Relating to church doctrine and practice, the "2 witness rule" applies but concurrently with that, the church also complies with all statutory requirements for reporting any allegation of child sexual abuse and child abuse to competent authorities as mandated in the local jurisdiction the church operates.
-
106
Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada
by poopie inbecause he was shunned by his customers?.
-
-
Fisherman
@Search RE: Factual Submissions by both parties.
"That is your side of the Story" -Fisherman
"Which, as my lawyer said to the Supreme Court, is precisely why we have judges." -Search
The "100% facts" that the elders submitted is for the legal proceedings that decide whether or not you get to have your day in Court. Your related posts apparently confuses that with the Judicial Review - if you win..
-
106
Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada
by poopie inbecause he was shunned by his customers?.
-
-
Fisherman
as my lawyer said to the Supreme Court, is precisely why we have judges.
IF the Court takes you case.
-
14
What does the society fill about psychiatrist?.
by new boy inplease help .
more research for my book .
-
-
Fisherman
What everyone needs to consider before going to a shrink is that you then have a psychiatrist record. Like a conviction or some other record that sheds a bad light on you, a psychiatric record is not good.
-
106
Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada
by poopie inbecause he was shunned by his customers?.
-
-
Fisherman
the affidavits of the two elders are being presented as being 100% factual,
Your complaint or whatever cause of action you filed is also presented as 100 percent factual. No?
to which I not only strongly disagree,
That's your side of the story.
-
106
Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada
by poopie inbecause he was shunned by his customers?.
-
-
Fisherman
In my case, the opposite has been done.
If you claim that Appellants violated confidentiality: Lawsuit! Big bucks!!!!!
Did you or your lawyers object to the protected information being used in Court?
-
106
Does anyone have info on the guy that sued Jw in Canada
by poopie inbecause he was shunned by his customers?.
-
-
Fisherman
Not dumb stuff ie stalking beating up spouse.
OK, but let's anyway consider such a case: A Family Court or Criminal Court can proscribe communication between family members.