Hi cofty,
Thanks for your interesting posts and threads on this subject.
I think I’ve explained the scriptures you reference on a previous thread. Your false derivative is based on wrong interpretation, namely what you personally conclude from the distinction between the 2 sorts of blood as explained in wt commentary.
According to your derivative, it was lawful for an Israelite to practice eating dead un-bled “kosher” animals and it was also lawful for those ancient Israelites to consume the blood of living animals just as long as they didn’t kill them, for example, in some places in Africa the natives extract blood from their living livestock and consume the blood. According to your interpretation, that does not violate the prohibition to keep abstaining from blood same as a bt which involves consuming large amounts of blood from living hosts. Inspite of your interpretation, I don’t see this lawfully practiced in the Bible as the Israelites surely abstained from this.