The scholarly consensus is already that VAT 4956 refers to events in 568 BCE.
And Wt has it’s own scholars conclusions. End of story.
Indeed. It is physically impossible for the reference to the solstice in VAT 4956 to refer to the solstice of 588 BCE
Based on the algorithm, authenticity of the vat, and 37th year and 18th year have a common denominator which you haven’t proven. You sound like the Islamics everything must be true when scholars believe it is.
This is a red herring.
No it is not.
However, the Bible also does not support JW interpretations about Babylon's 70 years.
It does. Believe as you wish.
Believe as you wish.
You haven’t authenticated the vat. You haven shown Nebs 18th and 37th year are related by a common denominator and you haven’t explained the accuracy of tge algorithm used. You are useless except for the solstice info that scholar seems to accept as true.
Ergo I will do my own research and form my own opinions. But you haven’t proven your case on this thread. Your evidence in unsubstantiated here because yiu failed to explain it. I will do my own investigation. My findings according to the information you presented is that there is reasonable doubt. Thank yiu for taking the time to post the soltice photos with hightights
You are dismissed.