Fisherman

Joined

• started 155 topics
• posted 5,295 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Fisherman

• 
  508

  If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

  by DJS in

  1. social
  2. current

  scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.

  by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.

  updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  But I hate their hateful views and teachings, just as I hate what I used to be and what I used to believe when I was one of them.

  How is not subscribing to same sex marriages a hateful view?
• 
  508

  If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

  by DJS in

  1. social
  2. current

  scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.

  by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.

  updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  .".violates any statute or lawfully adopted rule or regulation relating to his office.”

  DJS, you are no shrinking violet! -But neither is she.

  They cannot force her to violate her religious beliefs. If when she was appointed to public office, she did not know that she would have to issue same sex marriage licenses, then I think that she has a good reason for her case.
• 
  508

  If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

  by DJS in

  1. social
  2. current

  scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.

  by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.

  updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  "If she doesn't comply..." DJS

  Maybe yeah or maybe no. She claims that it is on religious basis. Seems that she is not doing her job but that depends on the terms she agreed to when she was put in that position and other things. Seems that they cannot or do not want to relieve/replace her.

  I think, that eventually, if she still refuses to issue same sex marriage licenses, she will either be given a reasonable accomodation or a pink slip. -But not an orange jumpsuit.
• 
  508

  If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

  by DJS in

  1. social
  2. current

  scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.

  by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.

  updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Yeah, No
  

  Not because you say so.
  
• 
  508

  If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

  by DJS in

  1. social
  2. current

  scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.

  by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.

  updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  We know because she said so, fisher person

  Washington (CNN)"The Supreme Court on Monday night denied an emergency application from a Kentucky clerk who has been refusing to issue marriage licenses because of her religious objections to same-sex marriage."
• 
  508

  If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

  by DJS in

  1. social
  2. current

  scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.

  by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.

  updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  The state , either federal or local, has no obligation to allow her to not do her job based on her choice of religion.

  Sure they do. And sure they have. I do not know if it applies in this case though.
  
• 
  508

  If she doesn't comply an orange jumpsuit is in her future

  by DJS in

  1. social
  2. current

  scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.

  by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.

  updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Jesus isn't the reason for her treason. It's hate.

  How do you know if this is true? What is known is that she did not do her job.

  In the US same sex marriages is the law of the land but so is is freedom of religion and freedom of expression. Just as gay people have rights under the law so do others. But should people be forced to approve of gay marriages? I think that people must recognize gay marriages because it is law. I wonder what would happen if a gay married couple attended KH? Would they and could they kick them out if they held hands, etc.

  In this particular case where this woman did not wish to issue the license, I do not think that she can claim freedom of religion, but I do not know for sure. She did not perform the marriage and she does not have to approve of it. It is the State that issues the license not her. She only does the paperwork. But if she has a problem with that, she could find another job that does not impose on her doing what she does not want to do. I would like to know how Marvin Shilmer sees this matter, but if religion is her reason or another valid reason, then must the State be forced to protect her rights and accommodate her someway so that she does not have to issue licenses to same sex marriages?
  
• 
  324

  VA shooting suspect was raised a JW! He mentions it on his Twitter account

  by WingCommander in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.

  bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.

  i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  WT indoctrination does not inspire JW or anyone to kill. I also do not believe that the recent killings on the news by people lashing out are motivated by wanting infamy as those in the past such as the killing of JL or JFK. Today, the motive is simple, people are angry and they want payback. Although religion is used to inspire terrorism, the reason behind terrorism is hate of the US and similar countries.

  People that are thriving have to reason to lash out except to maintain their position.

  "Surely oppression maketh a wise man mad."
• 
  96

  Ray Franz was an Idiot

  by vinman in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  ray franz who gave us insight into the gb due to a crisis of conscience was an absolute moron, with absolutely no critical thinking skills whatsoever like all of us have.

  i mean, to have a conscience based on some magic man in the sky.. how stupid can you be?

  in search of christian freedom?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Ray Franz ................ was an absolute moron

  I strongly disagree.
  
• 
  324

  VA shooting suspect was raised a JW! He mentions it on his Twitter account

  by WingCommander in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  anyone in the usa following this morning's shooting "on-air" live tv will know what i'm talking about.

  bryce williams (not real name, but on-air name) shot and killed 2 people on live television this morning in roanoke, va. he was wearing a go-pro camera, and uploaded his first-person video onto his social media accounts.

  i've seen his twitter feed (before it was taken down), and not very far down he mentions being raised a jw.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  these people did not have mental health issues

  I agree. These are angry people lashing out. Agree, it is insane what they do, but they have their reason for their madness, same as terrorist do and same as nations that drop bombs and kill innocent people and Presidents and Dictators and Kings and Police that have tortured and massacred people--and they have gotten away with it. Is that mental illness? People get angry, people get outraged, people lash out, either individually or in groups--but is that mental illness? Will gun control help the problem? I think that maybe a little, but it depends on what that means. In cities that regulates guns, any criminal can get get guns, for example, in NYC, there is gun control , but armed robbery with all kinds of guns was rampant for decades. The only people unarmed were the law abiding citizens and the victims of the crimes. About a year ago, gun control did not stop a madman for shooting 2 PO sitting in their car and then killing himself. That killing seemed like retaliation to me for the innocent man that was killed accidentally by a PO. If the government wants to do gun control, it has to be like how the Cubans got rid of all the guns in their country. They told me that even the police did not have guns. However, if gun control means like they do in some US cities, it does not mean anything. Anyone that wants to commit a crime can get a gun and lash out or do what he wants. Drugs like Heroine and Cocaine and other "Schedule" substances are controlled, but people get tons of it.

  Should you blame the newspaper when they publish about abuse of power and oppression by some people in office, for example, a news article I read stated that some prosecutor in Texas was found guilty of malicious prosecution, putting a man in jail for about 20 years (not sure if it was 40.) Although he enjoys immunity, he was sentenced to about a day in jail. (I wonder if he survived. Did not read any more about it. But they probably put him in protective custody for the day.) But are the newspapers doing wrong in publishing and exposing injustice and abuse of power? Should they be blamed when people lash out?

  Regarding the lowering of violent crimes in the US to 50 percent, I think that is true reflecting armed robbery and drug killings, gangs, organized crime, and the such. The killings now are from inspired terrorism, and retaliation motivated killing sprees, and acts of vengeance. Is that mental illness? That is the Defense's theory.