For instance, "So Kim Davis, can you should me exactly WHERE your religion forbids you to issue marriage licenses or otherwise serve any SS couple?
And ask the Muslim where does it say it in the Koran and then have the reporter tell her that that she is wrong. She would tell the reporter: "God Bless America because we can both have different interpretations, BUT HEY,DON"T TELL ME HOW TO PRACTICE MY RELIGION, now go to hell. The Courts have no authority to interpret the Bible or dictate to people how to practice their religion either. And whether the fiat comes from Rome or not, (in JW case regarding serving on Jury duty or joining the army, there is no edict) people still have the right to be conscientious objectors. What I find interesting about this case is that it involved an elected official not an employee.
What matters is when the Courts decide that it is the law that the employee MUST serve the alcohol regardless of what they believe., they have not, or, in KD case, that it is the duty of an elected official to issue ss in-spite of her beliefs. That is what my eyes are peeled for. I have not seen that is the law. A lot of people have a lot of different opinions about that, but they are only views.
There are other pending legal actions filed against her, discrimination if I am not mistaken, among other lawsuits. IT is very interesting that the State DOES want to file OM charges against her. They wanted to appoint a special prosecutor, they referred the charge to the Attorney General, who says that he cannot charge her because the case is being handled by Federal Court ... All that stuff is still pending. We have to wait and see. But even if they prosecuted her, that is not enough, she would still have to be found guilty of OM.