Fisherman

Joined

• started 155 topics
• posted 5,295 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Fisherman

• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  I do not feel qualified to analyze evolution and decide if that is the case based on the presented evidence.The evidence shown in support of evolution is very persuasive to me but I just do not know. I have concluded in a loving creator that fights for those that he loves, to me, that is a fact and even if evolution turned out to be the case it would not change what I know is a fact.
  
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Mephis

  Magnificent article!
  
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  you know that, right?

  Welcome to the JW! "They will know... they will surely know.." JW attest to another evidence. That is what convinces them and even trumps the kind of evidence that you refer to as the only evidence that exists.
  
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Is the statement "God created life" testable? How would you or anyone else go about testing that statement? Is there any supporting evidence?

  Not scientific physical evidence of the kind that can be shown -but nevertheless, remarkable, solid, striking, convincing evidence that can be measured by an individual. Without such evidence a person just does not know for sure.
  
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  I do not think that it is possible to disprove evolution. Anything seeming not to conform to evolution can be shown to reconcile some way, and even if it can't, that doesn't invalidate evolution, it only means that aspect of the evolutionary process is not understood. So, I think that it is a waste of time to attempt to invalidate evolution. It is not known for sure if evolution is the case even though it is widely viewed as a fact from the position that it is believed that the degree of evolution not being the case is almost null. From my experience it is hilarious watching amateurs proving or disproving it. They just do not know. You can sit in a classroom and learn it or in a court room and be convinced -but you were not there and did not see what happened. If you can measure evolution, case closed. But you can't, you are required to believe that it is a fact.
  
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Finally!

  Maybe.
  
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  Where does the Bible say that "God" did not create life to evolve? DD
  

  DD, JW concede that life changed ("evolved" ) but only within its "kind", and also rule out macro evolution. JW aslo teach that "evolution" is a conclusion or as cofty referred to it as "my belief." For your reference,"Coded Logic" posted on a previous thread a list of scientific institutes (an overwhelming amount of believers in that list) that accept evolution as an indisputable fact.

  DD you are a funny poster in your style of expression. I cannot stop laughing after reading some of your posts. Thank you for making me laugh.
  
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  There are no holes in facts and if evolution were a fact, the OP is nonsense. I think that is what Outlaw meant to say. From Outlaw's position, Outlaw's "mockery" is valid and cofty's entertaining any validating that the earth is not a sphere is hilarious.

  I always try to seek out the best arguments against my beliefs

  Facts do not need a following -only an instrument.
  
• 
  42

  Evolution is a Fact #10 - Non-Coding DNA

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  every cell in your body contains a big book of how to build another you.. although it's approximately 3 billion letters long only a small fraction of it contains instructions on making humans.. imagine trying to use a workshop manual but it reads like somebody messed up at the publishers.

  there are a few paragraphs of meaningful text followed by pages of gibberish, another page or so of useful instructions then 9 more of random words.

  some of it looks like copies of original text but full of typing errors.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  I agree - The same degree of possibility that the earth will turn out to be flat.

  May suggest that you read Aristotle? I do not reply no nonsense -end of discussion.
  
• 
  42

  Evolution is a Fact #10 - Non-Coding DNA

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  every cell in your body contains a big book of how to build another you.. although it's approximately 3 billion letters long only a small fraction of it contains instructions on making humans.. imagine trying to use a workshop manual but it reads like somebody messed up at the publishers.

  there are a few paragraphs of meaningful text followed by pages of gibberish, another page or so of useful instructions then 9 more of random words.

  some of it looks like copies of original text but full of typing errors.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Fisherman

  It was clear that you don't have the first clue about the science and that you have never read a single book on the subject.

  Are you kidding? And what do you know about my education? -But that is not a factor here. I have stated that the possibility exists for evolution to be falsified (that is not semantics you confused pseudo scientist) INDEPENDENTLY from what I believe (even if I believe in evolution) and that is one reason why evolution is not a fact even if you believe that it is.