When a city employee commits a wrongful act and that act causes damage to someone, the city is vicariously liable.
But what wrongful act is the wt doing when they are required by US law not disclose confidential communications and wt must comply?
It is the US law that protects confidential communications. And when state law contradicts US law, state law does not invalidate US law.
What does wt have to gain by keeping confidentiality? US law holds wt responsible not to disclose confidential communications.
WT still has a legal duty under US law not to disclose even when state law contradicts US law.
And how is wt covering anything up when confidential communications OF THE CONGREGANT is protected under US law. WT and elders are not gaining anything by the non-disclosure, to the contrary; US law holds wt accountable. WT is not covering up child abuse.
It is US law that covers up the communication- not wt.
I think that covers it except that in the US anybody can sue anyone for anything. And regardless of the validity of the case, all cases must be defended and that costs a lot of money and when the cost of the defense exceeds the damages sought, it is cheaper to settle. Defense costs money win or loose. The person being sued wants to pay the least amount as possible. The person suing wt and their attorneys want money from the wt. That is all they want --money --- and that is all they settle for; they don't care about child abuse confidentiality and the wt but only as it applies to their case in dollars. That is what US case law shows.