Law of duty to warn and protect not only applies to wt but to a Catholic priest that hears a confession and does nothing to protect his church or society and also applies to all religions. No legal duty but there is a moral one but moral duty of the church is not secular court subject matter. There is a catch that Conti case brought out and that is even if no legal duty to warn and protect exist, if acted upon to warn and protect , it becomes a legal duty. Law is tricky.
Anyway, Conti ruling applied only to church sponsored activities.
But RO, what do you think or what does legislation show at this time, does Conti ruling subject all wt fs activities to legal duty to warn and protect children even when jw go out in fs on their own or parents give their children to someone else to go out. Under what circumstances is wt liable or is wt always liable when children or adults go out in fs.
For the forum please.