A lot less than it would have done if they had to pay labour costs.
And how much is that?
just wonderin'.
A lot less than it would have done if they had to pay labour costs.
And how much is that?
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
RO is as much 'gay, therefore, non-JW' as I am Dolly Parton.
ROFL
I wonder too but that is what he says.
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
Fish, if you really can't figure it out, then frankly, that just confirms the implication behind the statement.
Again, what are implying again?
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
A fact that never ceases to amaze us. vid
What are you implying?
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
dub, I can read but I don't read conclusions if you know what I mean. I only posted what RO said.
Can you show once how posting facts is being a wt sympathizer versus your name calling which only shows you are sore. Why are you so sore and stop taking it out on me. You are a troll.
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
Did anybody try reading once? RO posted he is not a wt sympathizer. He also posted that he is not JW because he is gay. Reading helps people to understand things.
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
The diversion is refering to diversion by Listener in the first place when none exist.
And that response, of course, when inadequate,will cause damage to people. You understand that? -Chair
versus found inadequate and has caused damage
And from the evidence that we have had, that is likely to have happened. -Chair
versus the evidence shows that it has happened
That has already been determined. Beyond question. --Orphan Crow
versus
your liability will be determined on a case-by-case basis--Chair
and you will be contributing on a case-by-case basis. Chair
IF found liable for any given case. -Fisherman
Had the organization been found liable, they would be held liable for all cases with no more need of further determination in the future for any case except for the the amount of liability for each case.
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
diversionary tactics,
Which one?
Regarding wt new policies for Australia, whether or not the Australian government determines in the future that wt did not implement as they said they would do such new policies, that legal issue is to be decided upon by the government and not in advance by you as you always do without having all of the facts.
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
all exhibits for case study 54, jehovah's witnesses and watchtower, have been released by the arc.. http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/exhibits/10908a67-70c5-4103-94cc-dac096fdb585/case-study-54,-march-2017,-sydney.
exhibit list.
joint statement of o'brien and spinks.
"When a child says he or she has been sexually abused, common sense tells me that the police should be told so that the matter can go before a court. Natural justice tells me that a child abuser should be given a long custodial sentence, depending on the severity of the actions, and put forever on a sex offender list - two witnesses or not, mandatory reporting state or not" - what facts do I should I post to support this statement?
You said shame on the watchtower. I said back it up.