The US 51st's fighter jets continue to roam the skies 10 miles north of NK's border every day threatening NK and ready for war.
Fisherman
JoinedPosts by Fisherman
-
114
Breaking News - NK Missile Overflies Japan
by cofty instory breaking on reuters here.... kim jong-un seems determined to start a war.
nk is a national cult of personality.
hating the rest of the world is the first tenet of faith..
-
-
-
114
Breaking News - NK Missile Overflies Japan
by cofty instory breaking on reuters here.... kim jong-un seems determined to start a war.
nk is a national cult of personality.
hating the rest of the world is the first tenet of faith..
-
-
-
114
Breaking News - NK Missile Overflies Japan
by cofty instory breaking on reuters here.... kim jong-un seems determined to start a war.
nk is a national cult of personality.
hating the rest of the world is the first tenet of faith..
-
-
Fisherman
And unfortunately Trump is exactly the wrong person to de-escalate.
After threatening with 'fire and fury', is DT going to make a stronger threat? -Or regret what he said. The US is not ready for war with NK. He should not have made the threat unless he was prepared to carry it out. If DT downplays NKs defiance, who will take the US seriously the next time it utters a warning?
Link +3 / -4 -
14
Chapter 24 New Boy 50 years a Watchtower slave
by new boy inchapter 24. feed the rounder.
i was dying everyday on the machines.
i prayed.
-
-
-
14
Chapter 24 New Boy 50 years a Watchtower slave
by new boy inchapter 24. feed the rounder.
i was dying everyday on the machines.
i prayed.
-
-
-
49
Let's talk about Blood again....
by stuckinarut2 ini know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
-
-
-
49
Let's talk about Blood again....
by stuckinarut2 ini know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
-
-
-
49
Let's talk about Blood again....
by stuckinarut2 ini know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
-
-
-
49
Let's talk about Blood again....
by stuckinarut2 ini know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
-
-
Fisherman
spent 30 pages trying to explain it to you. I see you have learned nothing in the past 5 months.
@ Cofty: And to talk again about the topic, as Nathan Natas pointed out to you, your arrogant assertions fall down on their own merit. The Bible needs to talk. Who needs to listen to your pages and pages of explanations of Scripture, as if your explanations and conclusions based upon Cofty's beliefs established anything at all. You were shown scriptures falsifying your assertions. You failed to buttress your assertions with the Bible but instead deflected using Cofty based explanations, going on and on and on, repeating your Cofty based claims -which is a waste of time for anyone who sincerely wants to make a Bible based decision. Your theories sit upon your conclusion that God somehow gave Israel derivative approval to eat blood from dead animals. The scriptures I showed you invalidate your claims.
Link +0 / -1 -
49
Let's talk about Blood again....
by stuckinarut2 ini know we have all talked about this topic before, but for some new ones on the forum, or to refresh ourselves, i wanted to start this thread.. the society likes to go on about the sacredness of blood, and how it should not be transfused etc.. they liken it to a symbol of life itself.
something that should be respected and therefore not transfused.. but, what is more important: real life, or a symbol of life?.
an illustration came to mind.. if we give a bunch of flowers to a loved one as a symbol of our love for them, are those flowers more important than the love itself?
-
-