Yes, it does, but not because of the JW elder that hasn't been tried yet. I can't find where anyone said that.
Says you now after I explained the purpose of my link but since flipper had not made that clear in his post, someone could construe that he is convicting the man before a fair trial. I'm sure he knows what he means being the author of what he wrote and all, but someone else may not. One can only quote what he posted and what you posted.