crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
I'm referring to some on this thread who want total proof before even considering this child abuse suspect as possibly guilty. Flipper
Why not possibly not guilty? And in total fairness, not only in this case, shouldn't you have all of the facts before even considering whether something is possibly true or not, or are you inclined to believe something is true because you like it?
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
fisherman you sound like you are the wise old grandpa of this board
And you sound like you eat banana sardine sandwiches with mayonnaise jelly and peanut butter.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
I'm giving this example to show how stupid it is to argue semantics.
I figure that Mr. Flipper is expressing very strong feelings but that is only how I see it and not everyone has to feel the way I do or the way Mr Flipper does.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
Do you honestly believe that people here disagree with that concept and that you are the only one that gets it?
I don't know. I can only reply to what people post.
thanks for explaining it.
Now you see!
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
Here we go again. Another WT " spirit appointed " elder molesting a minor once more. Does it ever stop ? No . Flipper
Here we go again. That is what Flipper posted. That has not been proven in Court and the JW elder has not been found guilty of anything.
Why did you refer to the detectives of being guilty of sexual misbehavior?
It should be clear to you now that there is a difference between being charged with a crime and being found guilty of criminal charges. Everyone accused of committing a crime should be heard with all fairness. The Related JW elder is a defendant like the detectives in my post. That is my point. Got it? You remind me of a poster on this Forum named Vivian.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
Not really, not if it is actually read without an ulterior motive of finding fault.
Here we go again. Another WT " spirit appointed " elder molesting a minor once more. Does it ever stop ? No .
What ulterior motive does a reader have when reading this statement about the JW elder?
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
But thank you for admitting that you misconstrued what he said.
I never said that. I just cut and pasted his post. What you posted and what he posted has been published over the internet. All I said is that he did not explain what he meant in his post about the JW elder. He is the author of his post and he is responsible for what he wrote and so are you.
Not really, not if it is actually read without an ulterior motive of finding fault.
Well, I stated that the JW elder should be heard in all fairness.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
Yes, it does, but not because of the JW elder that hasn't been tried yet. I can't find where anyone said that.
Says you now after I explained the purpose of my link but since flipper had not made that clear in his post, someone could construe that he is convicting the man before a fair trial. I'm sure he knows what he means being the author of what he wrote and all, but someone else may not. One can only quote what he posted and what you posted.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
while stupidly standing up for his character.
Since he's out on bail- let's hope he doesn't skip town. WT Society needs to be brought down big time.
Man hasn't been tried. I don't know if the man is guilty or not. All I'm saying is that he should be heard first.
Learn to read man.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
Flipper is not condemning the JW elder as being guiltY
Here we go again. Another WT " spirit appointed " elder molesting a minor once more. Does it ever stop ? No . Flipper
