oh i dunno
OK.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
oh i dunno
OK.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
I could be wrong but seems to me that DataDog somehow believes that by disguising the statements that he posts, he can't be held responsible for what he publishes.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
Watchtower has acknowledged having it.
Scenicviewer, I asked you a specific question. Do you want me to repeat the the question to you? Did you understand my question to you?
This is what you have stated: "..Watchtower and ask for the list, the database of child molesters they compiled years ago."
Are you saying that you know that "Watchtower" has a database of child molestors? That is my question to you. Yes or No?
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
I told you - WAY too many.
Way too many what? My question to you was how many elders have been on the news for child abuse?
Watchtower and ask for the list, the database of child molesters they compiled years ago.
There you go again making accusations. Do you know that wt has a database of child molestors? I want to know what you know.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
It sure took you long enough to come up with that,
It was there all along. I posted the link on the first page only after a couple of post. I didn't come in in the middle of a discussion so how much more substance is there besides my reply to the posts before mine. But you changed your tune!
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
Wasn't an elder, but....
But is wasn't an elder. I didn't even bother to look at your link.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
but WAY too many are found guilty.
How many?
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
What I want to say is, it'd be a breath of fresh air if an elder got arrested for something else. Oh, I dunno, nicking a police van? ....make something up.......
Rofl
If and when that happens, it don't make headlines. What would be an interesting post is how many elders have been on the headlines for child abuse and how many have actually been convicted of that crime.
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
Very funny fisherman
You are very funny too, Ruby456
crime.
daniel macias said.. investigators learned that ramos was an elder at a jehovah’s witnesses church in the 4000 block of west mckinley avenue.
there, he met a teen girl and her family three years ago.. .
I'm referring to some on this thread who want total proof before even considering this child abuse suspect as possibly guilty. Flipper
Why not possibly not guilty? And in total fairness, not only in this case, shouldn't you have all of the facts before even considering whether something is possibly true or not, or are you inclined to believe something is true because you like it?