http://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/webcastview-webdiffusionvue-eng.aspx?cas=37273&id=2017%2f2017-11-02--37273&date=2017-11-02.
You have been served!
You are hereby summoned to appear at the Judicial Committee on May 22 2222 at KH of JW.........
If you fail to appear a decision may be made against you exparte...
You are being charged with the sin of XXXX
If you need pastoral help, don't come to us, go to Babylon the Great across the street or find yourself a good lawyer.
http://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/webcastview-webdiffusionvue-eng.aspx?cas=37273&id=2017%2f2017-11-02--37273&date=2017-11-02.
if they actually provided proper notice and if there are in fact rules were those rules followed.
The chief justice found no problems with the notice. I believed she said it was sufficient notice. I am sure wt will be able comply with the ruling. The issue is that the adjudication of sin also involves a termination of membership although a sinner is not being summoned to appear to a legal hearing but only invited to a pastoral meeting. The Court intervention in this case into the grounds of religion changes church practice to secular due process.
because he was shunned by his customers?.
And soon we will see how Canada sees it probably soon.
The light is yellow up until now but it can change.
http://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/webcastview-webdiffusionvue-eng.aspx?cas=37273&id=2017%2f2017-11-02--37273&date=2017-11-02.
he lied too.
Lawyers and liars sound the same.
i have had greatly varied experiences with hlc members over the years.
i was never one myself, but i knew several of them personally.
most struck me as being generally decent human beings.
You will not believe this OC but as I turned to read your post on this thread, I was speaking with a man (not JW) that had a problem with his bowel when he was born but this man showed me a horrific scar from the surgery he received as a baby. I mean horrific. Broke my heart. Besides such a scar- indescribable, he also suffers from incontinence.
After reading your post, I understand....
because he was shunned by his customers?.
Than you for the link, Terry.
http://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/webcastview-webdiffusionvue-eng.aspx?cas=37273&id=2017%2f2017-11-02--37273&date=2017-11-02.
how the legal victories were from Jehovah.
Very modest of him to say that because listening to him, he is very talented,
So watchtower had to sign an Amicus curaie with "false religion". Isn't this grand!!
There is an expression that I learned from the Porto Ricans and other Spanish friends ; "Juntos per no revueletos."
i have had greatly varied experiences with hlc members over the years.
i was never one myself, but i knew several of them personally.
most struck me as being generally decent human beings.
Yes, my baby survived. The doctors gave him a 3% chance of living. He lived because
OC, you and I have had discussions on this Forum. I sincerely respect your posts in our discussions not only because of sincerity on your part but also because you don't resort to deceit and logical fallacies just to win an argument.
Do you know that blood would have been a better choice for your baby? My JW friend wanted doctors to use non-blood when his newborn required it with HLC and all but the doctors outright used blood against my friends wishes -the baby died immediately. In your particular case, hind sight is 2020 but who knows what would have happened.
http://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/webcastview-webdiffusionvue-eng.aspx?cas=37273&id=2017%2f2017-11-02--37273&date=2017-11-02.
there are various reasons this could turn out bad for the organization.
Hi AM! A lot more is at stake here. It is religious grounds that the Courts have never explored. Also, it affects all Religions more than it does the JW.
http://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/info/webcastview-webdiffusionvue-eng.aspx?cas=37273&id=2017%2f2017-11-02--37273&date=2017-11-02.
As it applies to this case: Ought Caesar's secular standards stand on religious grounds?
