if you see someone about to be struck by a car or otherwise step into harms way but choose not to call out a warning or act in some way to prevent disaster, are you responsible for any harm caused?.
what defence, if any, can be offered for choosing inaction?
.
"Am I my brother's keeper?"
I would instinctively and most people would too; and who wouldn't? It is human nature to do so. But there are a lot of different circumstances and things can get complicated with laws governing everything. I don't think that laws should force people to be good Samaritans.
now that it is 1)easy to make edits in dna, 2) the invention of the quantum computer, 3)advanced algorhyms, 4)mass collection of dna code we should be able to change homo sapiens to homo evolutis.
i see a singularity coming.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nimj6snpq-o.
.
marked
so i have started down the path of trying to understand evolution, and to get the linear lies that the jws planted in my head out of it.
i bought an audiobook called "evolution: what the fossils say and why it matters" by donald prothero.
i heard it recommended on an atheist podcast that i listened to.
It gets murky sometimes. Hard to tell if it’s a bold-faced lie or just extreme ignorance?...
Paleontologists have yet to discover any transitional fossils between complex invertebrates and fish, and this destroys the whole evolutionary story.
so i have started down the path of trying to understand evolution, and to get the linear lies that the jws planted in my head out of it.
i bought an audiobook called "evolution: what the fossils say and why it matters" by donald prothero.
i heard it recommended on an atheist podcast that i listened to.
While resultant species believed to have evolved are evident, no one has ever come up with fossils of transitional species or a chain of evolving transitional species all connected to the resultant. Also, take the human being, there are no surving transitionals, only the final result. Hence, everything roaming the earth is a resultant species from the mechanics of the evolutionary process. But there should also be around the other species that connect everything together. There aren't any. --There are a lot of explanations though.
david splane explains newest understanding" of 'this generation" adding a 3rd group.... .
....The anointed flesh will not, should never be saved....
All comentary.
WT "this generation" teaching stands valid based on the definition of generation as wt applies the definition to the 2 annointed groups. And that's that.
david splane explains newest understanding" of 'this generation" adding a 3rd group.... .
No, that is not understood by any definition of a generation except the convoluted WT definition
Besides your remarks, you have not invalidated WT teaching of "this generation" as not conforming to the definition of generation.
david splane explains newest understanding" of 'this generation" adding a 3rd group.... .
I knew my great grandfather!
My great great grandmothers and grandfathers were around until I was around six. My great grandmother's sister lived till mid 1990's.
david splane explains newest understanding" of 'this generation" adding a 3rd group.... .
Fisherman, how is their overlapping generation definition a valid one?
Axiom that a generation definition includes overlapping ages. Applying the prophesy to the "anointed," the present "this generation" teaching conforms to such definition.
david splane explains newest understanding" of 'this generation" adding a 3rd group.... .
The overlapping generation teaching is SO stupid its beyond parody.
It is still a valid definition, nonetheless.
david splane explains newest understanding" of 'this generation" adding a 3rd group.... .
Is there any significance to the classification, as long people read, have fun, rejuvenate their synapses?
I don't think it is funny to start a topic fooling everyone into believe that it is a serious topic and it turns out to be a big joke. Suppose people started doing that all over the Forum?
