Oh gawd, here we go again with 'Scholar'. He's like a fly on shyte when he sees the magical numbers '607'.
Let me predict how this thread will go: Scholar will play coy with his high and mighty attitude playing duck and run with several posters who make way more sense than him and don't require 'faith' in the wts in order to understand their point. AlanF will likely be along to trade blows though its more like a battleship blastin' the shyte out of a canoe (you can guess who is which boat).
Scholar will not capably defend nor reasonably address the fact that the wts had to, MUST, use secular chronology to anchor their crappy version of relative biblical chronology. The same reasons they use to pivot on 539BCE are the same ones they should also use to believe the virtually totally accepted date of ol' Nebby's 18th regnal year. If they don't put such weight behind this other date, then 539BCE is out as well, and then no 1914, no GB, no authority behind dubs...
In essence, Scholar will allow all of the truly accurate and damning (against the WTS) information to once again come into the spotlight thoroughly convincing noobie JWD'ers and lurkers that the wts is backed by similar thinking crackpot apologists like 'Scholar'. Way to go 'Scholar'! Congratulations on the excellent 'witness' work your testimony gives to the other side.
boa....who just for once, would like to see a jw apologist, anyone!, come along and make one valid point for their side....