Preston, LMAO, somehow that really hit my funny bone.
Narkissos
"les non-dupes errent" ("the non-dupe err", perhaps the most famous Lacanian pun for "les noms du Père", "the names of the Father").
Implying that if god is the Word, god is also a delusion whose acceptance is inherhent in being homo sapiens sapiens? These modern French philosophers are too clever. Their signifiers signify too much; it gives me a headache and makes me feel like such a prole. I do love them, but in small chunks all smushed up and fed to me by someone clever.
I also think that if no defines yes, yes equally defines no, just as the rational and the irrational define each other. Isn't it an error then to privilege either one over the other?