To make a long story short I work with one of my old friends who happens to be a MS. We often get in discussions about witnesses and I have got him too admit that I am right about somethings in the past. I think he has looked into some of the things we have talked about and found that I am right but he just kinda dismisses them.
Anyway here is the deal. I almost made this agreement with him yesterday at work. I was going to challenge him to find one accepted historical publication not printed by the whatchtower that says 607 is the date for the distuction of Jerusalem. If he found it I would go back to the hall. (Not that I really would) I have read a few websites which say there is none, but I wanted to make sure first.
Will I win this bet?
By accepted historical publication I mean a text that would by accepted as a book widely accepted by historians and proffessors as accurate.