JT,
The value of intellectual "input" is in realizing it is not the significant Reality we desire. We may not know or be clear on what it is we seek, but we know words and thoughts don't suffice.
OK. No problem with that. I guess the problem of language and cognition has been recognized in Western philosophy as well.
Why not see for yourself? Nothing I say means anything.
What I meant was that once you reach that stage, being Christian or whatever is the label you stick onto yourself ceases to make any sense.
Can consciousness shift it's gaze upon itself? Can a bottomless vastness be entered? Is there a Self so limitless, pure and pristine that it can not be labeled or confined within any phenomenal identity? You tell me.
Again - a problem tackled, although not solved in Western philosophy. Some "definitions" of "the Absolute" would be close to what you seem to be describing. Nothing new under the Sun.
Actually, there are no definitions of the Absolute by definition. LOL. Ain't that just funny? So, please don't ask me to reveal the mystery of super-consciousness and the Absolute in a single post. LOL. thanks for your thoughts though. i do appreciate them. And I do have to cope with those challenges you've identified on a daily basis ;-)
Big Dog,
JT, I understand the advice you are giving, but I think that outside of possibly a handful Tibetan or Shoalin Monks very, very, very few people can achieve the type of introspection you prescribe, especially those that live in Western societies.
There is not even this handful of superconscious humans. Just as there are no monks mystics who "truly" understand the "meanining" of father Pio's stigmata. And there is no bunch of men in Brooklyn who are God's sole channel of communication. It's all mystical bulshit. Trust yourself, as JT teaches us. So with the exception of this reservation, I guess I agree with you.
Pole