This has been an interesting thread for me. I'm pretty sure we've read Ms. Popper's story before. I think Randy posted it some months back. What I've noticed in this thread (first by Black Swan--but then others) is an attempt to be rational about an emotionally charged subject. Not easy to do.
About a year and a half ago, I posted my four-part story about having served on the judicial committee (and subsequent disfellowshipping) of a close elder friend accused of pedophilia. http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/103545/1.ashx One of my reasons for doing so was finding a fair number of contributors here on JWD who expressed anger at me for not (at the time of the committee) recognizing the need to go to the police on this matter. My explanation that, as a fully indoctrinated JW, the thought of doing so never occurred to me was of no interest to some of these people.
Interestingly I once asked those coming to this forum this question: "If you had a female friend who was raped--but who decided not to press charges against the perpetrator--would you, against her wishes, go to the police to turn him in?" Almost everyone said they would not.
In this thread we read of the sad case of JW Daughter who, along with at least two other people, was sexually abused by her own husband. She herself admits that at the present time she has still not come forward to turn him in to the authorities.
It would appear that, in the particular case brought out in this thread, lots of contributors recognize that the congregation (as far as we know) can't be implicated. Previously I've asked folks on JWD to consider this scenario: A friend of yours tells you that he walked into a room where his child was being sexually abused by a neighbor you both know. For whatever reason he does not go to the police. It's true that you could go to them yourself. But if you don't, who is more culpable? You? Or the parent who actually witnessed the abuse?
Of course it's true that, in the past, the WTS had strongly discouraged the congregation from going to the authorities. That was terribly wrong. It's also true that, even if they have now discontinued this discouragement, with no encouragement to do so, the average JW still feels that he or she may be bringing reproach on Jehovah and/or the congregation by going to the authorities. Considering the strong position of authority the WTS assumes, to me it seems incumbent upon them to take a proactive approach, clearly informing victims and their parents of their rights and even responsibilities to go to the police. This seems plain to me only now--after exiting the organization and freeing my mind.
I suppose the intent of my post can be considered self-indulgent. It was hard to be the recipient of strong comments about my having been a horrible person--when in the depth of my heart I truly never understood (at the time) that going to the police was the right thing to do. But I submit that if we can provide a measure of understanding to women who don't turn in rapists or parents who don't turn in pedophiles, we should be able to see how well-intentioned-but-mentally-captive elders might have acted similarly.
I've been in the process of trying to contact the victims of that pedophile to try and move them to come forward. If they don't, I've decided to contact a law firm that I know will attempt some action. I hope that they, Melanie and everyone else can find the healing they need--and do their part to keep these individuals from acting again.