I found some replies to this issue on a another board that are so well researched that I am going to post them here in two separate posts:
I looked this up somewhere, now I have to find the link again. The only public reference to Wally Shiel and CAN is AFTER CAN basically disfellowshipped FOCUS. In other words, some members of CAN formed an offshot branch called FOCUS due I presume to internal philosophical differences (but I couldn't find what those were specifically) but certainly some disagreements with Rick Ross. CAN then gave FOCUS the boot and kept the name for itself, forcing the new 'child' to call itself by something new, it chose 'ReFOCUS'. It was at this time that Wally Shiel's name comes into the picture for the first time. Shortly after this ReFOCUS got its 501 status. Sometime around now also, CAN had been fighting a number of lawsuits led it seems by a Scientology-related attorney. One finally 'stuck' and led to the demise of the group and the name and other assets being bought up by what appears to be Scientology money. 1) People in the field are getting away from the word CULT, and certainly moving away from the word 'cult' and today I certainly wouldn't have it as part of my group's name. 2) The idea of forcibly changing someone's belief system has a long and glorious history among a certain Bible-based religious beliefe system. I think they believe their God is really STUPID and he can't really read hearts, and he would hold something against someone they couldn't help. but that goes to teh root of that belief system, does it not: that God can't forgive people for being born imperfect, oh no we must have thousands of years of blood, guts and glory to fix this why: because God proves how powerful he is--by doing NOTHING. 3)Yes forcible programming was never held in high esteem by very many, and recently not by anyone prominent in the filed of religious abuse; not that I could find. Just my 1/2 cents worth _________________ |