dear glenster...
the problem with each of these paths to reform:
"The methodology of reform can be classified into two groups, one depending on
re-interpreting the traditional texts which constitutes Islamic law. This
varies widely from little deviation from the traditional interpretation, to the
more liberal which considers only the meaning of Qur'an as a divine inspiration,
while the wording is believed to be from the prophet Muhammad intended by him to
suit his time and situation, therefore interpreting the problematic verses in
modern times allegorically or even not considering them.
"The second is questioning the authentic status applied to texts by the Tradi-
tional Islamic Scholars, resulting in the most liberal case as of the Qur'an
Alone Muslims in rejecting the Islamic narratives of the sayings and practises
of Prophet Muhammad, namely the Hadith completely."
...in almost every instance of allah speaking, mohammad puts himself on par with his god. it is very much allah + mohammad say...there is no other point of view no other "witness" what-so-ever..."O mankind! the Messanger hath come to you in truth from Allah: believe in him: it is best for you. But if you reject Faith, to Allah belong all things in the heavens and on earth: and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise." surah 4:170...backing up 2 verses: "Those who reject Faith and do wrong, Allah will not forgive them nor guide them to any(168) except the way of Hell. To dwell therein for ever. And this to Allah is easy.(169)"...the muslim, unfortunately, is stuck with mohammad and allah...together that IS the Faith.
love michelle