dear punkofnice...
If our understanding of why God's actions/judgements were carried out is limited our perception of the goodness of God is skewed.
We read about how God sent out the israelite armies to destroy entire tribes. The other side is rarely explored in "bible study" but if it was it would illuminate the goodness in God's actions/judgements in sending out israelite armies.
We can ask ourselves, would destruction BE good if these other tribes DID pose a serious risk if left unchecked?
The backdrop we are given is that the tribes that the israelites went up against were the descendants of "the giants"...they were the hybrid offspring of fallen angels. The bible says that the first round of destruction was because the inclination of the heart of man was towards evil continually. What if they were truly evil, an evil that sought only to devour everything good in their path. We're told that that's what giants do (numbers 13:32-33). If that was true and the reason for the first destruction, then God's action WAS good as far as cleaning the slate (so to speak), wasn't it? Future limited destruction to stave off the problem of nephilim offspring would be considered judicious...good, wouldn't it?
Think about this: if you have no reservations about believing God is not good based on selected biblical accounts, you have unquestioning belief without evidence. Your bias is spinning the text your way, isn't it?
michelle