Bill,
This is one of the most confusing posts ever. Ranchette has made a good effort to clarify it. But confusion still exists.
First, change the word response to message, response means reply, the message you received is not a reply to a post from silentlambs.
Two, is the word silent lambs after your introduction of the post a signing off of your introduction or the salutation from the email sender?
Third: boldwords added by belbab (for clarification of the meaning, I hope) and message put in italics by typing at the beginning of the message, [ ] with an i within the brackets and typing [ ]with /i within the brackets at the end of italized message. If I type the i and /i you will only see the result of italics not what I typed.
I reply to this man,(to Mister Bonnell) (who is being used by the Jehovah's Witness Society),
I don't appreciate YOUR twisted views of this matter. I have seen evidence of your wisdom. When you were approached on the matter of my daughter's father,(my former husband??) who admitted to molesting my younger sister,(ie, my former husbands sister in law) you looked at my little sister and stated, "What is the big deal, it is not like you were raped or anything."
I am deeply saddened that someone like my daughter's father,(my former husband) and James Bonnell is allowed to offer counsel and guidance, and be in any good standing at all within an organization that professes to be exclusively of God. This just adds insult to injury.
Keep up the Great work SilentLambs...Shine those lights, and EXPOSE this darkness!
(signature or some nom-de-plume of emailer)
belbab, confusor or clarifier, who knows?