What I don't like is when the WT says that "the conditions for being a NGO changed" and that they could not agree with the new conditions.
Does the WT say that "the conditions for being a NGO changed"? Here you can find the WT's official response http://www.randytv.com/secret/wtresponseun.htm It says that "Still, the Criteria for Association of NGOs ? at least in their latest version ? contain language that we cannot subscribe to. " Someone may conclude that "at least in their latest version" means that the criteria have been changed. But if the criteria had been unchanged from the start - which seems to be true - you could refer to the (unchanged) criteria as "the latest version". I consider the WT's official response is a vague reply - intentionally.