Hey Everyone:
Man this thread just keeps going and going. Well I've been reading this inroduction to sociology book I got a few yrs back at this college I used to attend here in the N. O. The book refers to something called social control when discussing deviance. There are two types of scial control one called informal the other formal. Informal control involves less serious punishments for deviance like scolding or even a simple facial expression of disapproval. It can also include serious punishments like capital punishment etc... Formal control includes systems like we see in the West for the most part like courts, police, judges, prisons etc...
The text points out when speaking of informal control societies that " Violence in these societies is nonetheless quite rare -as are adultery and other deviances-apparantly a testament to the effectivness of informal control. The deterrent effect of informal control in traditional societies is greater than that of formal control in modern societies." This is why I think linking the violence in the U.S. with it's policy of capital punishment lacks merit. Often times when there is a clear and inevitable consequence for deviant behavior, ppl are less likely to commit deviant acts. However in the U.S. criminals are given many many chances more often than not to reform themselves. In the process they become caught up in the system and this leads them to a life of crime that continually escalates to more serious levels of crime.
ONE....
Bigboi
"it ain't what ya do. it's how you do it" quote from the song "True Honeybunz" by Bahamadia