Rune,
If I may make a quick observation. It seems that you believe that showing emotion during a debate means that all objectivity is lost. Having made that assumption, I do not think that it is even possible for emotion to be completely left out of any conversation. Humans are innately emotional. Just as we are also innately intellectual.
Therefore, while I am not saying that you don't have some valid points here, the people who have been MORE honest and accurate in this discussion are the ones who have admitted that they are in fact being emotional, to a certain degree.
It is hard for me to accept that you are calling these people "delusional".
* Human = emotional being
* During debate one party admits this = honesty
*Other party's basic argument is that emotion = loss of objectiveness
* Neither party is ABSOLUTELY right.
* However, by a preponderence of the evidence, a determination is made that the party ackowledging a basic human tendency over which he may try to minimize for the debate's sake, but will never be able to eliminate altogether is slightly MORE right.
Do you find that argument within any realm of possibility?
Brad