rmt1

Joined

• started 7 topics
• posted 540 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by rmt1

• 
  9

  Scientific method approach to false prophecies

  by DS211 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method.

  the process of proposing a hypothesis, and then testing its accuracy by collecting data on events the hypothesis predicts.

  if the predictions match the new data the hypothesis is supported.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/planned-obsolescence-as-myth-or-reality/?_r=0

  "In a notable paper from 1986, Jeremy Bulow asserted that a monopolist not threatened by entry would have an incentive to produce goods with “inefficiently short useful lives.” But if consumers have the option to switch to good substitutes — as arguably they do now in the smartphone market — the incentives could run in the opposite direction. Your company might capture a larger share of the market if consumers believe your products are more durable."

  They have to stay just one camel straw ahead of "who will we go to?" That's all the specification they have to engineer to. To do that they have to devalue their previous doctrine products in order to make the new doctrine products more paletable, but those new doctrine products still have to be conspicuously costly for the weak-minded or the socially-hostage to feel they can only come from a superhuman source. The GB are handpicked (by who knows what metric) to sustain a reality distortion field.

  Apologies for pointing at the engieering and not the science.
• 
  9

  Scientific method approach to false prophecies

  by DS211 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method.

  the process of proposing a hypothesis, and then testing its accuracy by collecting data on events the hypothesis predicts.

  if the predictions match the new data the hypothesis is supported.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  Interesting. I appreciate hypotheses that seek to explain or model how it is that the JW leadership do what they do and get away with it, since it defies all reasoning and present (2013) models or examples of self-generated thoughts or self-directed action. Being as they are one of the most self-referential systems, Ptolemaic in the extreme, asserting that all events of the world center on them like celestial spheres, it is consistent to add a time dimension to their sense of entitlement, and model things as you say - "Their past errors is the energy, the food, that powers the wt." So to that extent (who knows what fractional component) they don't even require any present adversaries. They are 'their own worst enemy'.
• 
  9

  Scientific method approach to false prophecies

  by DS211 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  scientific method.

  the process of proposing a hypothesis, and then testing its accuracy by collecting data on events the hypothesis predicts.

  if the predictions match the new data the hypothesis is supported.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  They have applied the scientific method to the best way to lie, the most optimal lies, the most efficient method of diseminating lies, the best way to prevent the discovery of lies. They are absolutely scientific in how they harness, leverage, exploit human weakness. They crack the human soul to produce a dollar the way a nuclear engineer cracks an atom to produce a joule.
• 
  89

  Boeing 747s and Other Misunderstandings about Evolution

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  perhaps the most common misunderstanding that prevents people from grasping evolution is complexity.. we see it almost daily on the forum where people mention dna or the eye or any of a multititude of examples and ask how it could have arose "by blind chance"?.

  whenever you see a reference to chance and complexity it is obvious the person hasn't yet grasped the basics of the theory.

  chance is only one part of the process.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  Prebiotic significance of extraterrestrial ice photochemistry: detection of hydantoin in organic residues.
  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059641

  

Formation of Amino Acids and Nucleotide Bases in a Titan Atmosphere Simulation Experiment
  http://www.sarahhorst.com/Publications_files/Horst_2012_amino.pdf

  Cold chemistry like on comets and Titan has less chemical equilibrium that would quickly destroy newly-created complex molecules.
• 
  111

  " the universe made itself " but---

  by prologos in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  watching the fertilization of an ovum and subsequent cell division it appears that the new being is making itself.

  parents were involved, unskilled labor, time, energy.

  no thing has ever been observed to make itself, to my knowledge.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  Caltech cosmologist Sean Carroll says that energy is not conserved in universal relativistic acceleration, because energy is already not conserved in General Relativity:
  http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/22/energy-is-not-conserved/
  
  Sean Carroll prescribes sticking with the first Friedman equation which runs off total energy density:
  http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2013/11/16/why-does-dark-energy-make-the-universe-accelerate/
  
  Drexel cosmologist Dave Goldberg allows the anthropic principle to answer why our dark energy is so much smaller than the analogous/comparable vacuum energy:
  http://io9.com/5607692/are-physicists-just-making-up-dark-energy
  
  Dave Goldberg applies photon loss of energy by redshift to conservation:
  http://usersguidetotheuniverse.com/?p=3124
  
  An io9 contributor, Alasdair Wilkins, explores consequences of different dark energy ratios:
  http://io9.com/5817957/what-does-dark-energy-mean-for-the-end-of-the-universe
  
  U Florida cosmologist Ethan Siegel's rushed effort to explain conservation of energy:
  http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2011/12/02/dark-energy-accelerated-expans/
  
  Some random physics prof asserts conservation of energy since Big Bang, because QM:
  http://www.physicscentral.com/experiment/askaphysicist/physics-answer.cfm?uid=20120221015143
  
  UC mathematician John Baez provides a hack equation for conservation of energy in GR, but does not say it is universal:
  http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html
  
  Young Czech string theorist's attempt to explain why energy is not conserved in a cosmology with GR:
  http://motls.blogspot.com/2010/08/why-and-how-energy-is-not-conserved-in.html
  
  Keep in mind that photons redshift and lose energy coming up out of a gravity well, and photons lose energy crossing the (accelerating) expanding dimension of space. Your counsel is your own.
• 
  111

  " the universe made itself " but---

  by prologos in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  watching the fertilization of an ovum and subsequent cell division it appears that the new being is making itself.

  parents were involved, unskilled labor, time, energy.

  no thing has ever been observed to make itself, to my knowledge.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2011/popular-physicsprize2011.pdf
  http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2011/advanced-physicsprize2011.pdf
• 
  5

  This Fractal Zoom Reminds Me Of The Time I Took A Heavy Dose Of Blue Flying Saucer LSD Back In The Day

  by frankiespeakin in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  enjoy the experience:.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foxd6zqlnlu.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  Have you tried Mandelbulb?
• 
  111

  " the universe made itself " but---

  by prologos in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  watching the fertilization of an ovum and subsequent cell division it appears that the new being is making itself.

  parents were involved, unskilled labor, time, energy.

  no thing has ever been observed to make itself, to my knowledge.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  I think that the conception of a reality or a physical universe without a deified first cause is a fourth spatial dimension unto itself, and, depending, sometimes, it literally, figuratively, and mathematically, cannot be conceived.
• 
  37

  "What exactly is his world view? from Cofty I see nothing but, anti-life, anti-love, anti-hope"

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  villagegirl's question on another thread was probably supposed to be rhetorical but i want to respond to it.. many times people of faith express similar misapprehensions about those who don't share their views on eternity.. i want this to be a positive thread.

  an opportunity for atheists to share what moves and inspires them.

  what do you live for, what gives your life meaning and purpose?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  Anthemic. In general, my impression of those who must believe is that they are prone to self-satisfaction, and those who cannot believe are prone to the inability to be satisfied. Different brain chemistries for different folks: Some habits reward in the sense of belonging to a group that is subordinate to a broader context. Some habits reward in the sense of defying, breaking, expanding or complicating those broader context(s).

  http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/
• 
  62

  Ok, now I know why you atheists get so spittin' mad at some believers.

  by Julia Orwell in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  cuz they feel like they're banging their heads against a wall.. i don't really fall into the category of atheist or believer, but i'll go where the facts lead me.

  that generally leads to atheism, and is why atheists end up getting mad and therefore rude at believers: they will lay out facts, raise questions, play devil's advocate, and reason in an evidence-based, structured way.

  i've seen it many times before on this forum.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  rmt1

  http://discovermagazine.com/2013/may/09-archaeologists-find-earliest-evidence-of-humans-cooking-with-fire#.UpP8U43zZts