And apostates are ever so respectful of the Witnesses, aren't they
Apostate is a neutral term.
in broken images he is quick, thinking in clear images; .
i am slow, thinking in broken images.
i become sharp, mistrusting my broken images, .
And apostates are ever so respectful of the Witnesses, aren't they
Apostate is a neutral term.
in broken images he is quick, thinking in clear images; .
i am slow, thinking in broken images.
i become sharp, mistrusting my broken images, .
Sorry Jean beanz, but people like Valis just put it right up me I thought you were the same, but I was wrong
in broken images he is quick, thinking in clear images; .
i am slow, thinking in broken images.
i become sharp, mistrusting my broken images, .
Unlike apostates, and unlike Jehovah's Witnesses - I do not know if they have the truth.
That is the difference. Are you getting the idea yet?
according to my little cousin who was (never) one of jehovah's witnesses, i have been doing my (research) wrong.
he told me that if i wanted to find out information about the watchtower and the united nations, then i would need to start typing in (numbers) instead of letters and words into my search engines.
here is what he told me!-----see below:.
Apostates, gnawing at those images.
in broken images he is quick, thinking in clear images; .
i am slow, thinking in broken images.
i become sharp, mistrusting my broken images, .
1. Apostates are people who believe that Jehovah's Witnesses do not have the truth.
2. See above. Such a single belief may not be so important to be called a "core set of views" were it not for the amount of time and energy apostates expend on such a belief (just as Jehovah's Witnesses do on the converse - that Jehovah's Witnesses do have the truth).
3. See number 1.
Thank you pole.
being recently self-dissassociated, i cannot get out of my head something that happened to me more than 20 years ago.
having studied much in my youth, and being the submarine witness that i was, i married at 19 and began my "worldly coarse".
i just knew it was the "truth".
This is something I can't get out my head:
Oh come all you slaves of Jehovah most high...
Who've given your heart to your God.
Come out to the work he's entrusted to you
Walk pathways your master has trod.
The seed that is fine... blah blah blah blah...
hope i can get some positive feedback., and i really mean it, don?t want to offend anyone but .. .
reflecting on your own experiences are people on this website mainly open to new points of views, new ideas, or is this mainly a site for criticizing even when there?s no concrete evidence just for the sake of it.
reason why i?m asking this is because i?ve been a member here for just under a week here and already had unpleasant experience of being dragged into pretty nasty argument just because i dared to disagree with someone.
Sorry
hope i can get some positive feedback., and i really mean it, don?t want to offend anyone but .. .
reflecting on your own experiences are people on this website mainly open to new points of views, new ideas, or is this mainly a site for criticizing even when there?s no concrete evidence just for the sake of it.
reason why i?m asking this is because i?ve been a member here for just under a week here and already had unpleasant experience of being dragged into pretty nasty argument just because i dared to disagree with someone.
Apostates can't get past the Holy Images.
Apostates are just as bad a Jehovah's Witnesses!
I am a former Witness.
in broken images he is quick, thinking in clear images; .
i am slow, thinking in broken images.
i become sharp, mistrusting my broken images, .
There is no doubt about that.
But is it a bad thing?
in broken images he is quick, thinking in clear images; .
i am slow, thinking in broken images.
i become sharp, mistrusting my broken images, .
I am the same one