I hate the Olympics. I’m 100% on board with this, in fact they don’t go far enough in my opinion.
But I do realise that’s a minority view and many people, including JWs, will agree somewhat with your perspective.
the main article on jw.org is about the succesfull olympic games 2024 in paris.. many withness watch all the sport episodes of the games, but jw.org comes with a sour story about the games and not reaching real peace.. again jw.org is on the wrong side of history a d doesn't feel the public anx jw opinion.
the closing remarks of the ioc president bach, thaf the games will not reach peace but plant peace in the hart of people was a strong message.. the organization and message of the games is all that jw.org wants to, but can't.. very sad and narrow minded, as ever.
gorby.
I hate the Olympics. I’m 100% on board with this, in fact they don’t go far enough in my opinion.
But I do realise that’s a minority view and many people, including JWs, will agree somewhat with your perspective.
i would suggest:.
the short answer is yes.. the longer answer is a qualified yes, with some caveats.
the short answer is yes because jehovah’s witnesses teach that jesus is michael the archangel, their leader, eldest and most powerful, and have taught this since the very beginning of the religion.
Yes Jeffro it matters to people who think it matters, to state the obvious. You’re entitled to your opinion, as are others.
Vanderhoven7,
The point is that Jehovah's Witnesses are not permitted to have a personal relationship with Christ or even to express their gratitude or praise directly to him.
It’s that JWs follow Jesus’ own instruction to address prayers to God through him, and follow the pattern Paul set of directing thanks to God. If we are supposed to give prayers of thanks to Jesus then why didn’t Jesus tell us to do so, and why didn’t Paul do so?
Although prayers of thanks are not directed to Jesus in scripture, or in JW meetings, they do express their gratitude to Jesus in prayers to God and these expressions are often part of JW prayers, especially at the Memorial. In this sense JWs adhere very closely to the biblical pattern.
https://youtu.be/k2hwesvuddq?si=7g6pvmqvcfh-cke4.
ChatGPT translation:
Dear Atlantis, dearest friend and so much more, I am in tears, wishing with all my heart that you recover. No matter what happens, I can't help but believe that all the work you've done will be your letter of recommendation, and having run so well, the eternal crown will be yours, and we will be the jewels that adorn it. You are and remain the best witness to the freedom of our consciences, not just in words but through all your acts of courage and perseverance in the face of that tentacled sect that is the Wt.
Atlantis, we love you, and we owe you so much. May we hear the cry of love that is ours, and may it deliver you from the terrible illness that afflicts you.
I cry and say thank you, you are so precious to us.
Martial
i would suggest:.
the short answer is yes.. the longer answer is a qualified yes, with some caveats.
the short answer is yes because jehovah’s witnesses teach that jesus is michael the archangel, their leader, eldest and most powerful, and have taught this since the very beginning of the religion.
Vanderhoven7, you say:
JWs have as much of a personal relationship with Jesus Christ as they do with the angel Gabriel.Imagine not even being able to say "Thank you Jesus for dying for my sins.
Where did Paul ever say “thank you Jesus” as you suggest? Aren’t JWs here following the pattern Paul set of thanking God, or thanking God in the name of Jesus, and through Jesus? But not “thank you Jesus”.
'I give thanks to God always for you.' (I Cor. 1:4)
I thank God that I speak in tongues more than you all? (I Cor. 14:18)
Thanks be to God who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.' (I Cor. 15:57)
Thanks be to God who in our Lord Jesus Christ always leads us in triumph.’ (2 Cor 2:14)
Thanks be to God who puts the same earnest care for you into the heart of Titus.' (2 Cor. 8:16)
'Thanks be to God for his inexpressible gift.' (2 Cor. 9:15)
'I thank my God in all my remembrance of you. (Phil. 1:3)
'We give thanks to God always for you all ... remembering before God our Father all your work? (I Thess 1:2-3)
'For what thanksgiving can we render to God for you?' (I Thess 3:9)
'We are bound to give thanks to God always for you.' (2 Thess 1:3)
'Always and in everything giving thanks in the name of our Lord Jesus
Christ to God the Father: (Eph. 5:20)
We always thank God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, when we pray for you?' (Col. 1:3)
'To the only wise God be glory for evermore through Jesus Christ. Amen. (Rom. 16:27)
'Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.' (Eph. 1:3)
i was asking why jws won't sing any church hymns even if they were doctrinally correct.
jws asked me in response if i would sing any of their songs.. dan watkins wrote .
its a hilarious misunderstanding, if it does not come from the watchtower bible and tract society, then it is effectively considered as coming from satan.
The old classic From House to House here at 5.45
i was asking why jws won't sing any church hymns even if they were doctrinally correct.
jws asked me in response if i would sing any of their songs.. dan watkins wrote .
its a hilarious misunderstanding, if it does not come from the watchtower bible and tract society, then it is effectively considered as coming from satan.
Well they should have done if they were following theocratic direction proper. 🤓
i was asking why jws won't sing any church hymns even if they were doctrinally correct.
jws asked me in response if i would sing any of their songs.. dan watkins wrote .
its a hilarious misunderstanding, if it does not come from the watchtower bible and tract society, then it is effectively considered as coming from satan.
Some of them are pretty good. In general I prefer the old song book, but a few of the new songs are good too. I like The Victory Song. I met a disassociated person in the town last week and he told me he has old records with the old songs on them and The Victory Song is one of his favourites. We both sang the song in the middle of the town and we both knew the words. His wife was there. She was looking on her phone at the time.
I used to like the old song about increasing light. I think it was song 111 in the old book and we used to sing it at conventions when a new teaching was released. But a lot of the song have been modified and I don’t think they are improvements. For example Stay Awake Stan Firm Grow Mighty has both modified lyrics and tune and it’s not as good as the old one. I sing the old lyrics on purpose sometimes.
The new song about Jesus at the and of the convention is pretty good.
I came across a comment in a book called Hell: In Search of a Christian Ecology by Timothy Morton that said Jehovah’s Witnesses have all the best tunes, but it turns out he was talking about Prince and The New Radicals, not the JW songbook.
.
.
no wonder they instructed congregation elders to throw away old literature from kingdon hall libraries.
Sea Breeze, if you prefer the Byzantine text to the modern critical text produced by scholars fair enough, there are some who take that position. And yes I agree that quotations from early church fathers is one of the strands of witnesses that can be useful for recovering the early text. Scholars who argue for “God was manifest in the flesh” in 1 Tim 3:16 are in the minority, but even if it is to be preferred, it could be compatible with JW theology because Jesus was the one who revealed the invisible God because he is the exact representation of his Father. But once again you are ranging quite wide in a scattergun approach to salvage some point from the thread. They are all interesting topics for sure but it’s noticeable each time you don’t have the courtesy to acknowledge the previous point before going on to the next claim.
i would suggest:.
the short answer is yes.. the longer answer is a qualified yes, with some caveats.
the short answer is yes because jehovah’s witnesses teach that jesus is michael the archangel, their leader, eldest and most powerful, and have taught this since the very beginning of the religion.
Thanks, Blondie, for the examples, especially the 2024 up to date one. 👍
i would suggest:.
the short answer is yes.. the longer answer is a qualified yes, with some caveats.
the short answer is yes because jehovah’s witnesses teach that jesus is michael the archangel, their leader, eldest and most powerful, and have taught this since the very beginning of the religion.
One of the few places in WT literature I have found where Jesus is called an “angel” is in the old pink children’s book Listening to the Great Teacher, page 16.
Does anyone know any others?