It’s also worth considering that ancient people in general knew that plants need sunlight too, as did presumably the people who wrote, selected, and preserved the words of Genesis as scripture. It’s unlikely that they did so in ignorance of the fact that plants need sunlight. So whatever the reason is for the text being ordered the way it is, an explanation that presumes ancient people made some kind of stupid scientific mistake here is pretty unlikely.
slimboyfat
JoinedPosts by slimboyfat
-
13
Does maths prove the bible is wrong?
by joey jojo inthere might be a few that find this post boring, because, you know - its maths.. i like maths but im not a mathematician or condsider myself any type of expert on the subject.. there is a branch of maths called propositional logic that is used widely in computers and computer programming that allows computers to make decisions based on certain conditions.
for example: if a condition exists, then do something.
like: if the a button is pressed, then the letter a will appear on the screen.
-
slimboyfat
Depends how long a day was, or how near the end of the third day God created plants, because plants could presumably have survived a few initial hours without sunlight. Maybe it’s even in some sense better for the plants to install them first then turn on the sunlight rather than the other way round, again, providing there isn’t a long period in between.
It’s also worth considering that ancient people in general knew that plants need sunlight too, as did presumably the people who wrote, selected, and preserved the words of Genesis as scripture. It’s unlikely that they did so in ignorance of the fact that plants need sunlight. So whatever the reason is for the text being ordered the way it is, an explanation that presumes ancient people made some kind of stupid scientific mistake here is pretty unlikely. -
7
Why I dislike eschatology
by Riley inhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ouye3e0fypc&t=183s&pp=yguzd2h5igkgzglzbglrzsblc2noyxrvbg9neq%3d%3d.
please take the time to watch.
i am not good with words but i have heard someone so eloquently explain how i feel about something.
-
slimboyfat
You stole my point, kind of.
And at least you believe Jesus existed, ha!
According to reports, some of Jesus’s statements related to the end-times might have been misinterpreted. (John 21.23)
-
21
Is the JW version of The Lord's Supper really a Parody?
by Sea Breeze ina black mass is a ceremony celebrated by various satanic groups.
it ... is intentionally a sacrilegious and blasphemous parody of a catholic mass.
- wikipedia.
-
slimboyfat
I recognise the rhetorical terms as a throw back and I think I have an idea of the argument you’re making, but I’m not sure. Could you explain what the argument is first. Who exactly is a child murderer and why?
-
21
Is the JW version of The Lord's Supper really a Parody?
by Sea Breeze ina black mass is a ceremony celebrated by various satanic groups.
it ... is intentionally a sacrilegious and blasphemous parody of a catholic mass.
- wikipedia.
-
slimboyfat
nicolaou, 2010 called and it wants its New Atheist talking point back
-
4
And they say this with a straight face!!!
by BoogerMan inuw chap.
15 p. 121 par.
9 how does jehovah direct his organization?.
-
slimboyfat
At the moment they’ve got an Australian, a Canadian, and an Austrian member, and in the past they’ve had members from Greece, Germany, and the UK. I don’t know any other “lands” represented. They’ve not exactly gone out of their way to try to be representative in terms of nationalities.
They probably do genuinely think they are not conducting themselves as “masters over your faith”. Whether that’s a reasonable perception many others would dispute.
-
7
Why I dislike eschatology
by Riley inhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ouye3e0fypc&t=183s&pp=yguzd2h5igkgzglzbglrzsblc2noyxrvbg9neq%3d%3d.
please take the time to watch.
i am not good with words but i have heard someone so eloquently explain how i feel about something.
-
slimboyfat
Did Jesus dislike eschatology? Or people that couldn’t define academic terms, for that matter?
-
21
Is the JW version of The Lord's Supper really a Parody?
by Sea Breeze ina black mass is a ceremony celebrated by various satanic groups.
it ... is intentionally a sacrilegious and blasphemous parody of a catholic mass.
- wikipedia.
-
slimboyfat
You said a black mass is “intentionally sacrilegious” and then posed the question “Do JW's perform a similar Parody”. If you didn’t mean to malign the intentions of ordinary JWs then you could have at least expressed this differently.
Your sympathies for the Watchtower are duly noted.
Noted where and for what purpose? I agree with JWs on some things and disagree on others, could you write that down too, wherever this record is being kept.
Over 20 million attend the memorial, not 10.
-
21
Is the JW version of The Lord's Supper really a Parody?
by Sea Breeze ina black mass is a ceremony celebrated by various satanic groups.
it ... is intentionally a sacrilegious and blasphemous parody of a catholic mass.
- wikipedia.
-
slimboyfat
I think that ordinary JWs overwhelmingly practice their religion sincerely and attempts to portray them otherwise are inaccurate and prejudicial. If you think they are not correct in how they conduct their memorial service then argue the point, don’t portray them as secretly worshipping Satan or other nonsense.
-
8
I just made a video that every JW should see.
by Kosonen ini just made a video every jw should see.
the aim of this video is to help jehovah's witnesses be more open to constructive critisism, especially from their own members, that are swiftly excommunicated /disfellowshipped/ removed from the congregation if they dare to point out their religion's flaws concerning doctrine and practises, even when there is scriptural evidence.
i have first hand experience of that.. https://youtu.be/71zcv7lux3g.
-
slimboyfat
No, that’s totally off putting. There is no way your real presentation wouldn’t have been better than that.
-
12
Atheist philosopher Philip Goff becomes a Christian
by slimboyfat inphilip goff, professor of philosophy at durham university, in the past few weeks has said that he has become a christian of a fairly liberal and perhaps somewhat heretical variety.
it’s been a long journey from staunch atheism in his teens, to questioning the basis of his atheism and a purely materialist conception of reality as a professor of philosophy specialising in consciousness, to now considering himself a christian.
he says it’s the result of coming to terms with the fact that atheists and theists both have good arguments and looking for a middle ground that accommodates the best arguments of both.
-
slimboyfat
Yes, on the one hand the history of life is a sequence of extinctions and nature is against survival. But on another deeper level, why does reality exist in such a way that life and consciousness are even possible at all. Why should it? It’s bit like pointing out bad weather makes survival more difficult but ignoring the question why there’s a planet on which weather is even possible in the first place. It seems to me that the existence of reality does reasonably call for an explanation, and invoking a being that is outside of existence as we understand it approximates what might look like some explanation. This is why I think God is likely but I don’t know for sure.
I’m more sure about other mundane things that others have different opinions on. For example I’m 90% sure the covid virus came from a lab in Wuhan and I have been sure of that from the start. I’m 90% sure Russia didn’t blow up its own gas pipeline but it was probably the US with or without help from others. I’m 90% sure that senior officials have been knowingly covering for Biden’s dementia for years. These things seem obvious to me to the point that many people have failed a basic kind of societal level intelligence test in not seeing the obvious.