Etude

Joined

• started 34 topics
• posted 604 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Etude

• 
  9

  my 25 year anniversary of life after the WTS

  by jookbeard in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  its been a hell of a journey and not one i regret, i've had my testimony featured in free minds, married divorced, married again had 2 children, survived a very serious illness and come out just about unscathed.

  it all started sometime in the early 1990's around the time of the waco siege, i just couldn't accept these crazy doctrines anymore of the belief system i was born into, the death and destruction of billions, the big a, the restoring of the earth to a paradise and the even bigger lie of a resurrection of billions, come early 1993 i had decided to fade, i attended the memorial of that year and decided never ever to return and i never did, come 1994 i had really hit rock bottom, divorced the following year, moved away,started a new career, a new life, the rest they say is history, anyone reading this and having similar thoughts, go for it!

  you wont regret it..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  In 1982, after receiving no answer from headquarters to my letter about Mexico/Malawi.
• 
  40

  Introduce myself

  by dantoole87 in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  i'd like share why i went from being a teenager determined to work in full time service for jehovah my entire life, to now being on here commiserating with you all.

  i use to be an atheist but i now believe in god.

  but i'm not preachy about god.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Your tale is very comprehensive, dantoole87. You capture very well the pettiness and over-lording of elders. But you are not alone in representing this issue. That is why I would disagree with you on one statement:

  "JW's could be a very good productive religion."

  Their entire platform is conducive to all that you describe happened to you. If there are people still in it, it is because they're either masochistic or are still brainwashed. I liken saying it's a good productive religion with saying the plague is a good and productive disease because it kills the weak. There is nothing redeemable about that religion. Are there good people in it? Sure. Can some people in it do good works? Yes. Can they even promote good values? Absolutely. But so can the rest of the world, atheists and Flat-Earth believers, Shintoists and Xtians, famous people and the vast unknown sea of individuals. The operative word here is "PEOPLE." When it starts to muddle up into an "organization", it's time to run.

  By its very structure, the congregations end up being currupted either by all members or by a few with delusions of power. They end up turning into, as you describe, "assholes" and "yes men." Still, it's a pity that you had to experience all you have and I wish the best for you as you move forward in life.

  You managed to revive in me the same anger you feel when looking back at the experiences we share with elder assholes and super-fine brown-nosers. It's been a while for me, but I've mostly shed my fury at those people. Although I wish they'd disappear from the face of the Earth as an organization, their works will eventually catch up to them. All the best to you in your endeavors.
• 
  18

  Talking Janet Jackson and Religious Freedom with the Wife

  by OnTheWayOut in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  my recent sidewalk discussion with a couple of jw's has gotten me in the mood to say more when appropriate.so the wife and i were riding in the car and cat stevens comes on.

  i mentioned to her that cat stevens left music when he was still popular and converted to islam back in the 1970's- how he was told that his music would have to be morally acceptable and he found it easier to just abandon making new music for at least 20 years.

  so i didn't really remember all the details and i figured the conversation would die.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  OnTheWayOut:
  

  Great conversation. You are fortunate that you have someone you can speak to congenially. If she was quiet after your comparison, something was rolling around in her mind. Hopefully, it will fall into the hole it belongs to sometime in the future. I don't have much luck talking to people with JW ideas (like family) or with other religious fanatics. Good for you!
• 
  52

  Gas or Electric Stove

  by just fine in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am getting new appliances.

  i have decided on black stainless for the finish.

  the house is stubbed for gas and electric for the range.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  I've had both. Definitely gas. It just cooks better because I feel I can control it better. It's also cheaper in most places.

  Etude.
• 
  15

  Funeral plan ?

  by Chook in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  to all you young and old alike what would you have as a farewell party from this earth , would you party with friends months before or would you go out quietly and rather have input into the wake.

  i have heard of these duck hunters who put their ashes in shotgun shells.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Yes! Definitely a plan: A big-assed party! Not a funeral. Unless it's like a New Orleans funeral. I want a remembrance where people are free to say what they loved about me and what pissed them off about me. Don't hold back and don't expect repercussions. What people felt about me is real, good or bad. I would hope that the good mentioned is enough to offset the negative. I want music...lots of music. If you feel like dancing, dance away. If I have sufficient money left, I'll leave enough to rent the venue and pay for the food and drinks and a DJ. That's my last hurrah! I don't expect to be a conscious part of this universe anymore. If my JW family wants to show up, they're welcome to join in with the others, in the terms I've described. No religious speeches or Bible quoting allowed. But if they feel that's essential (I don't to completely restrict them) and and they declare it ahead of the event (they would have to), then someone gets to read all about what I think of that sick organization FIRST! Let them follow with their feeble explanations. Otherwise, no one needs to hear my last "beef" on the JW. After that, let the party begin!

  Etude.

  
  
• 
  50

  Completing the Scan of All WT Publications - Bibles List

  by ILoveTTATT2 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am working with paul grundy from jwfacts and with the administrator of avoidjw.org, and they are ok with me doing the work that i am doing right now, which is to try and complete, as much as possible, the availability of everything the wt has ever published, in pdf format.therefore, i will start listing in this thread what i have not been able to find anywhere online.

  please let me know where i can find the pdf's for the following:(now, i know that there are multiple versions of these and that there are some that seem the same but they are not.

  i am looking for the wt published versions of these publications.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  That's a collisal task. Scanning whole bibles too??? I wouldn't have the patience

  I would. I think it's important enough in order to document changes and defeat a lie. I volunteer to do it if you have the material. I have a pretty good scanner (50 pages at a time). I just have to prep the pages. That means that sometimes they have to be cut and trimmed, sacrificing the original bounded text.

  Etude.
• 
  47

  Has the Bible been redacted so that YAHWEH can be promoted to EL's position as Almighty God?

  by I_love_Jeff in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  for background, read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/yahweh, the section, "iron age i: el, yahweh, and the origins of israel.

  " "el and his sons made up the assembly of the gods, each member of which had a human nation under his care, and a textual variant of deuteronomy 32:8–9 describes the sons of el, including yahweh, each receiving his own people.

  "el, the kind, the compassionate,' 'the creator of creatures,' was the chief of the canaanite gods, and he, not yahweh, was the original 'god of israel'—the word 'israel' is based on the name el rather than yahweh.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  vienne: I never let my students use wikipedia as a resource. It is often wrong.

  So, do you think it's wrong in this case? I don't know if it's right. But neither do you. The way to update a Wikipedia entry is to change the text and then it's examined by the panel of experts who will approve it. Yes, the "experts" are arbitrary. That means that anyone can make an entry in Wikipedia. But no all entries are approved, especially if a verification process has shown some errors. Entries need to be challenged. I don't know and probably there's no way to know how often Wikipedia is wrong. So the characterization by you of "often wrong" is really incalculable. How many times has Britannica been wrong? I don't know. But I know it has had incorrect entries (read the link). If something is wrong in Wikipedia, you must feel privileged that you have the power to make it right. Anyone can make the changes and submit for approval. If you have the truth, by all means help us all achieve it.

  Etude.
• 
  50

  Im "Going To Die In Armageddon"

  by pale.emperor in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  3 missed calls from my jw brother last night.

  i didnt answer because he's actively shunning me and when he does ring it always to preach to me about how we're so close to the end and how i should "humble myself before the mighty hand of god" .

  he then texts me saying "we need to talk".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Reverse shun these arseholes

  pale.emperor: That's what I would do. Except that I would not have the courtesy of telling them that or anything else. I'd keep in the dark. When they ask out of wonder if I'm dead or wonder if something happened to me, then I would respond telling them that I'm protecting myself from bad association from them for several reasons, including that they are in a cult and have given up their intellect to a lying organization.

  My family is not like that. But they live 3,000 miles away and seem to be aware that I'm still alive. Once in a while, they seem to know what I'm up to.

  Etude
• 
  162

  2017 Convention Video To Be Shown Regarding The 1975 Failure

  by pale.emperor in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go3arnnsfkk&feature=youtu.be.

  no mention whatsoever that it was watchtower themselves that strongly hinted towards this date.

  instead they blame those who "put their trust in a date, not jehovah".. let's recap... .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  It's always interesting to parse the WT dialog. For many years, I noticed the unique phrases they use, not just in literature but also in speeches. They stood out because English for me is a 2nd language. For example, they'd say: "It may well be that..." or "Some believe..." In the video, the dialog stated: "some were looking to a certain date as signifying the end of this old system of things". The key words or phrases here are "some were" and "a certain date". So, t's not that they're too fucking scared to say "we were" or "looking to 1975". It's that they have always had a manner that can work to deflect and provide deniability. Using the passive voice ("mistakes were made") is a good technique. I heard it from Fred Franz's mouth. He was the best practitioner of subterfuge I knew up-to-then. I think we need to give the bastards their due and admit that they know what they're doing. They are not just zealots. They are world-class manipulators.

  I remember the first International Assembly in 1969 in Yankee Stadium. There were indications back then about 1975. After being in Bethel for a few months in 1974, we attended the Gilliad graduation at the Sunnyside Assembly Hall in Queens, NY and I heard Fred Franz say, after stating his deduced chronology that it would be an appropriate time for Jehovah God to begin his 1,000-year reign through Christ precisely in 1975. Of course, that lit up everyone's imagination. I wasn't sure what to think then.

  Etude
• 
  133

  Why is the white race so different?

  by Crazyguy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  what i'm saying is the white race is the only one that has a verity of eye and hair colors , so what gives?

  is it that this race was influenced genetically by a group of pre humans that didn't mix with other races?

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Etude

  Race exists because we (collectively) have defined it. The problem is that we (lay people as well as scientists) have defined it in dozens of ways and the definitions accumulate as time and understanding increases. Some of our definitions or the ones we agree with can be subjective. Throughout this conversation, I've seen attempts at definitions (some more accurate than others) and the superimposition of someone's understanding of race over a different explanation. Unless there's some consensus, the conversation is doomed. I suppose that's what happens in the larger world, away from this microcosm, and why race is such a touchy issue. Only real knowledge can help.

  Etude.