Churches want their cake and be able to eat it also. Each justice of the SCOTUS should have their heads examined and in my opinion aren't qualified to render such a decision or sit in the position of justice. If a church wants to discharge someone for not TEACHING doctrines of their faith, I agree that courts should stay out of that decision process. In this case however, the church has won the ability to discharge someone if they are Black, Old, Married or Not, Uses a Wheelchair to get around or any of the other protected status's that we as Americans enjoy working in any other job.
Second point not to divert thread but look also at recent Oklahoma ruling. Judges are allowed to use international law including Shaira Law in their decisions. EXCUSE ME!! I'm not going to that state anytime soon. Don't want to be taken to court by some male acusing me of looking wrongly at his (adult) sister and wanting me executed for causing his family emotional harm.
Polgamy is illegal. But wasn't polgamy originally decided on by a RELIGION? And Government got involved and said "No" to that.
And to cases of theft, well then the churches don't mind the court system getting involved. They can possibly get their money back. Hypocritical at least but that is the system we live in.