Jgnat,
Hello
Commendable aspirations,
Thanks
lousy implementation strategy.
What is the implementation strategy? And what would be a better way?
I have a few concerns, which I hope you will address.
Thank you for sharing them with me
Please stop using the royal "we", unless you are the official spokesman of your entire co-op. You can speak authoritatively about your own thoughts and feelings. You have not earned the right to speak for others.
Seems I have used the royal "we" only once. Here it is in context;
Dear brothers and sisters, servants of God, Jehovah's witnesses, Ex-JW's, opposers, apostates, and athiests.
Jehovah's witnesses need your help. I would like to thank you for all the work you have done so far. We need as many critics as we can get. We as Jehovah's witnesses extend our thanks and would like you to continue your efforts and even encourage you to examine us even closer.
We need to understand all the problems that we are faced with by corporate religion. Not repeating symptoms like some partisian hack. But rather seeking to define the 'real' or root problem which causes the others.
This royal we is used in line with the representation of the principles of the Jehovah's witness co-operative. The principles themselves are the "offical spokesman" of the entire co-op. Anyone that repeats the principles of the JW co-op are and can be spokesmen of the offical principles. It's not about personalities that somehow get voted in that are supposed to be offical spokesman. It's about the principles themselves which get voted in and therefore each JW co-op member is an offical spokesman. Very different from the corporate paradigm. That is in the corporate paradigm "offical spokesman" often say things that are against Jehovah's witness priciples. The principles supersed the person speaking.
You have chosen to fully understand the WTBTS in order to reform it. I maintain that a reformer must first fully understand himself.
I am not reforming the Watchtower corporation. The "society" is not the Jehovah's witnesses. It is a small group of "witnesses" that claim to represent us. I have no intention of reforming this elite group.
As for understanding myself; I am a story I often tell. I understand the inreality of self.
Have you thoroughly examined your own motives?
I can always do some more examining.
Do you know what your weak spots are?
I am hoping you will point those out.
If you do learn how to move large masses of people in the direction you want to go, what will you do with that power?
I was thinking of this the other day. The only thing I can reply is reliquish the power. Being one of the founding members I believe I will try to say that founding members cannot be allowed to be voted into positions of power. What ever that means or can mean. It may also be possible to never have positions of power in the first place. We will see. What do you think?
I would be most interested on your opinion of this article. http://struggle.ws/ws99/portugal58.html
Pretty intresting article thanks for sharing it. Lots of things to consider. I don't have an opinion. How do you feel about it?
Better to light one small candle than to curse the darkness.
http://polemotheos.home.comcast.net/JWco-op.html