Delta20
I just wanted to be clear on this point that you stated:
Havent I admitted already that organizations can be flawed and people make mistakes... if I didnt then here it goes: organizations can be flawed and people make mistakes.
You admit that humans make mistakes correct?
Organizations can be flawed correct?
If those "mistakes & flaws" cost human lives, is it worth it to continue to believe what those mistaken humans and flawed organizations are claiming, knowing that they have been wrong before? How is anyone supposed to trust in future claims made, knowing that past claims have been wrong?
If you went to a doctor to diagnose a medical condition and found out later that the diagnosis was wrong and you lost a limb, or an organ, or suffered through a treatment that wasn't needed, but only caused you some discomfort (and you had to pay for this with your own $$$), would you continue to go to that doctor and trust in his judgement? Would you say that well, one mistake was made, they have discovered their error and corrected it, so now I will give them the benefit of the doubt and trust their judgement?
If you found out that your accountant was cheating you, would you continue to use that accountant? Would you allow this accountant to repent, and then say, well they have learned a new way of keeping the books, and now I don't worry about them cheating me any longer? If you caught this accountant cheating you again, would you continue to trust this accountant?
If you found out your car mechanic was wrong, and it cost you your car due to wrong repair would you continue to to reccomend this person to others? Would you take your new car back to this same mechanic? Would you say to yourself, well, maybe they won't be wrong this time, or maybe they have learned something new or realized their error, so perhaps this time it will be okay?
Would you continue on this path of trusting those who have previously been wrong?
If you say no, then why would someone trust their spiritual well being in an organization that has been wrong on so many occasions? Because they are changing their stance? Does that not show that they have been proven wrong, otherwise why the need to change? If they were wrong previously, then what is to say they won't continue to be wrong?