The biggest point that is missing on this thread is paganism isn't just about origin but also about usage! is something that has pagan origins being used in the same way as it originally intended with those pagan origins?
For someone that has been out of the Witnesses for 10 years you are certainly applying a modern reasoning prescribed by the society! If this actually applies, what about Birthdays?
You can definately say this of the cross it's always been a symbol of diety and worship from it's pagan roots onwards, Now lets look at JW usage of the Watchtower it the symbol on the front of one of their magazine and the lapsed title of the organisation (say watchtower and tract society to average person they'll go "Huh?" say Jehovah's witness and they'll know who your talking about)
No they wont, Jehovahs Witnesses are well known for their connection to the Watchtower Society.
I just don't think the pagan arguments on this thread are very strong. You may disagree but i think original post sounds like the appologist trying to drag up a pagan link and comparative equality between the Cross and the watchtower which just doesn't stand up to close scrutiny.
There were not just pagan arguments but those related to the Occult whether that be Christian Occultism or otherwise - the fact is the Watchtower symbol was introduced at a time when it was being widely used by Occultists including Masons and Hermeticists as well as Pagans.
Not doing a good job of remaining no part of this world eh?
Gary