Thanks Sky,
I do have a lot of questions about the Bible, it's origins, it's authenticity, and if the canon is legitimate. For instance I am aware that many of the concepts are completely unoriginal. The virgin birth, and the concept of a benevolent, sacrificial diety predate Christianity. I am aware of this.
As I stand I am yet a Christian. I do believe in God because the order I see around me confounds the idea of a chaotic existence. I accept the idea of a sacrificial diety because it does make sense to me in context of Jewish tradition, and the logical progression of a benevolent Creator who made us in His image and yet to have free will.
Do I believe the Bible is the perfect, complete rendering of the word of God? No I couldn't make that case.
However for the sake of argument, as I stand today, I am willing to accept the assumption that it is. You see unless a conclusion follows from it's premise statements alone, it cannot be known to be true or false, only likely or unlikely. However great those books are, and however much you think you know, the best you could hope to tell me is that the Bible is unlikely to be God's word. So right now I do accept that assumption for the sake of arguments I need to make today, which was the point of my questions.
See my mind isn't necessarily closed. I don't believe in closed paradigms. I think the truth can survive perfectly well in an open and questioning paradigm. The reality is that my mind can only think about one thing at a time. Right now the most pressing questions I have are the ones above.
But thanks for checking_my_premises,