If you go to the above link you will find that what is presented on this thread is very much in error.
Ok, I went to the link. Admittedly I didn't read every word because I don't have time at the moment. Upon reflection I realize my original post has left out alot of details. Admittedly, this is a very complicated subject. I certainly wouldn't want to join the slanderous crowd that tries to imply that the wt is evil simply because there are pedophiles in their midst. Pedophiles are everywhere.
Where the wt comes under scrutiny is in considering the question of whether or not their policies in anyway protect pedophiles, or fail to protect children.
I think we all can, and should agree, that protecting children is the highest priority. It should have priority over the reputation of any individual jw. It should have priority over protecting the wt from the bad publicity of having a pedophile in their ranks.
With that said, instead of posting a link, could you answer the "most critical" question? Or could you ask the question to the wt itself?
"Are there any cases where a jw has pressed charges against a jw pedophile, and they have not been punished in anyway by the congregation"
The last time I heard the question asked, the wt only produced two cases and they were cases of non-jw's who molested jw's. If the wt can't even produce a number of such cases, then that is a very strong indication that there is a unspoken policy to keep all cases of molestation hidden from secular authorities.
This policy would leave children at risk because ONLY placing pedophiles in prison can protect children completely.