@kate - ok without putting words in your mouth tell me which bit I am misinterpreting:
We cannot adopt anthromorphism to God, he is not human,
Ok you can assert what he is not - that doesn't really move your argument forward as to what 'he' is
the knowledge of God is in science,
Most scientists disagree, so at best you are making another unsubstantiated assertion
this fuels my enquirey as to why he is indifferent,
interesting personal viewpoint
it does not stop me from thinking he exists
So your default position is to believe in an indifferent God without substantial evidence for either his indifference or his existence?
In summary you have no idea what is going on - correct?